Demographics details for Spanish fork, UT vs Sulphur, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Spanish fork, UT vs Sulphur, OK.
| Data | Spanish fork | Sulphur |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 44,102 | 4,951 |
| Median Age | 27.4 years | 38.8 years |
| Median Income | $93,989 | $55,951 |
| Married Families | 43.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.8 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Spanish fork vs Sulphur
- In Spanish fork, the population is higher at 44,102, compared to 4,951 in Sulphur.
- The median age in Sulphur is higher at 38.8 years, compared to 27.4 years in Spanish fork.
- Spanish fork has a higher median income of $93,989 compared to $55,951 in Sulphur.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Spanish fork at 43.0% compared to 34.0% in Sulphur.
- The poverty level is higher in Sulphur at 14%, compared to 6% in Spanish fork.
- The unemployment rate in Spanish fork is higher at 3.8%, compared to 3.5% in Sulphur.
Demographics
Demographics Spanish fork vs Sulphur provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Spanish fork | Sulphur |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 2 |
| White | 80 | 60 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 12 | 12 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 16 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 10 |
Demographics Comparison: Spanish fork vs Sulphur
- In Sulphur, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 1% in Spanish fork.
- Spanish fork has a higher percentage of White residents at 80% compared to 60% in Sulphur.
- Both Spanish fork and Sulphur have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Spanish fork and Sulphur at 12%.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Sulphur at 16%, compared to 7% in Spanish fork.
- In Sulphur, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 10%, compared to 0% in Spanish fork.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Spanish fork | Sulphur |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.0% | 19.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.8% | 13.1% |
| Depression | 23.8% | 25.3% |
| Smoking | 7.7% | 21.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 8.3% | 14.6% |
| Obesity | 31.0% | 40.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Spanish fork vs Sulphur
- In Sulphur, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 15.0% in Spanish fork.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Sulphur at 25.3% versus 23.8% in Spanish fork.
- Sulphur has a higher smoking rate at 21.4% compared to 7.7% in Spanish fork.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Sulphur at 14.6% compared to 8.3% in Spanish fork.
- Sulphur has higher obesity rates at 40.7% compared to 31.0% in Spanish fork.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Sulphur at 19.0% compared to 8.0% in Spanish fork.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Spanish fork | Sulphur |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (175) | 1.8% (88) |
| High School Diploma | 9.1% (4,010) | 18.2% (899) |
| Less than High School | 5.9% (2,583) | 18.1% (898) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.4% (8,546) | 10.9% (542) |
Education Levels Comparison: Spanish fork vs Sulphur
- In Sulphur, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.4% in Spanish fork.
- In Sulphur, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.2% compared to 9.1% in Spanish fork.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Sulphur at 18.1%, compared to 5.9% in Spanish fork.
- A higher percentage of residents in Spanish fork hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.4% compared to 10.9% in Sulphur.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.