Demographics details for Spanish fork, UT vs Stillwater, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Spanish fork, UT vs Stillwater, OK.
Data | Spanish fork | Stillwater |
---|---|---|
Population | 44,102 | 49,160 |
Median Age | 27.4 years | 23.4 years |
Median Income | $93,989 | $39,998 |
Married Families | 43.0% | 25.0% |
Poverty Level | 6% | 16% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.8 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Spanish fork vs Stillwater
- The population in Stillwater is higher at 49,160, compared to 44,102 in Spanish fork.
- Residents in Spanish fork have a higher median age of 27.4 years compared to 23.4 years in Stillwater.
- Spanish fork has a higher median income of $93,989 compared to $39,998 in Stillwater.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Spanish fork at 43.0% compared to 25.0% in Stillwater.
- The poverty level is higher in Stillwater at 16%, compared to 6% in Spanish fork.
- Stillwater has a higher unemployment rate at 4.0% compared to 3.8% in Spanish fork.
Demographics
Demographics Spanish fork vs Stillwater provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Spanish fork | Stillwater |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 5 |
White | 80 | 72 |
Asian | Data is updating | 6 |
Hispanic | 12 | 5 |
Two or More Races | 7 | 9 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 3 |
Demographics Comparison: Spanish fork vs Stillwater
- In Stillwater, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 1% in Spanish fork.
- Spanish fork has a higher percentage of White residents at 80% compared to 72% in Stillwater.
- In Stillwater, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 0% in Spanish fork.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Spanish fork at 12% compared to 5% in Stillwater.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Stillwater at 9%, compared to 7% in Spanish fork.
- In Stillwater, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 0% in Spanish fork.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Spanish fork | Stillwater |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.0% | 19.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.8% | 13.2% |
Depression | 23.8% | 26.1% |
Smoking | 7.7% | 19.5% |
Binge Drinking | 8.3% | 13.6% |
Obesity | 31.0% | 42.0% |
Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Spanish fork vs Stillwater
- In Stillwater, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 15.0% in Spanish fork.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Stillwater at 26.1% versus 23.8% in Spanish fork.
- Stillwater has a higher smoking rate at 19.5% compared to 7.7% in Spanish fork.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Stillwater at 13.6% compared to 8.3% in Spanish fork.
- Stillwater has higher obesity rates at 42.0% compared to 31.0% in Spanish fork.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Stillwater at 11.0% compared to 8.0% in Spanish fork.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Spanish fork | Stillwater |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.4% (175) | 0.5% (239) |
High School Diploma | 9.1% (4,010) | 6.5% (3,199) |
Less than High School | 5.9% (2,583) | 3.9% (1,910) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.4% (8,546) | 22.5% (11,068) |
Education Levels Comparison: Spanish fork vs Stillwater
- In Stillwater, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.4% in Spanish fork.
- A higher percentage of residents in Spanish fork hold a high school diploma at 9.1% compared to 6.5% in Stillwater.
- More residents in Spanish fork have less than a high school education at 5.9% compared to 3.9% in Stillwater.
- In Stillwater, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.5% compared to 19.4% in Spanish fork.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.