Demographics details for Spanish fork, UT vs Chino hills, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Spanish fork, UT vs Chino hills, CA.

Data Spanish fork Chino hills
Population 44,102 77,949
Median Age 27.4 years 39.4 years
Median Income $93,989 $117,548
Married Families 43.0% 47.0%
Poverty Level 6% 8%
Unemployment Rate 3.8 3.5

Population Comparison: Spanish fork vs Chino hills

  • The population in Chino hills is higher at 77,949, compared to 44,102 in Spanish fork.
  • The median age in Chino hills is higher at 39.4 years, compared to 27.4 years in Spanish fork.
  • Chino hills has a higher median income of $117,548, compared to $93,989 in Spanish fork.
  • In Chino hills, the percentage of married families is higher at 47.0%, compared to 43.0% in Spanish fork.
  • The poverty level is higher in Chino hills at 8%, compared to 6% in Spanish fork.
  • The unemployment rate in Spanish fork is higher at 3.8%, compared to 3.5% in Chino hills.

Demographics

Demographics Spanish fork vs Chino hills provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Spanish fork Chino hills
Black 1 4
White 80 14
Asian Data is updating 40
Hispanic 12 29
Two or More Races 7 13
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Spanish fork vs Chino hills

  • In Chino hills, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 4% compared to 1% in Spanish fork.
  • Spanish fork has a higher percentage of White residents at 80% compared to 14% in Chino hills.
  • In Chino hills, the Asian population stands at 40%, greater than 0% in Spanish fork.
  • Chino hills has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 29%, compared to 12% in Spanish fork.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Chino hills at 13%, compared to 7% in Spanish fork.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Spanish fork and Chino hills at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Spanish fork Chino hills
Mental Health Not Good 15.0% 12.7%
Physical Health Not Good 10.8% 8.0%
Depression 23.8% 14.6%
Smoking 7.7% 7.9%
Binge Drinking 8.3% 15.3%
Obesity 31.0% 28.4%
Disability Percentage 8.0% 7.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Spanish fork vs Chino hills

  • More residents in Spanish fork report poor mental health at 15.0% compared to 12.7% in Chino hills.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Spanish fork at 23.8% compared to 14.6% in Chino hills.
  • Chino hills has a higher smoking rate at 7.9% compared to 7.7% in Spanish fork.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Chino hills at 15.3% compared to 8.3% in Spanish fork.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Spanish fork at 31.0% compared to 28.4% in Chino hills.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Spanish fork at 8.0% compared to 7.0% in Chino hills.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Spanish fork Chino hills
No Schooling 0.4% (175) 1.1% (849)
High School Diploma 9.1% (4,010) 9.6% (7,450)
Less than High School 5.9% (2,583) 7.2% (5,599)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 19.4% (8,546) 34.4% (26,814)

Education Levels Comparison: Spanish fork vs Chino hills

  • In Chino hills, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.4% in Spanish fork.
  • In Chino hills, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 9.6% compared to 9.1% in Spanish fork.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Chino hills at 7.2%, compared to 5.9% in Spanish fork.
  • In Chino hills, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 34.4% compared to 19.4% in Spanish fork.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.