Demographics details for South plainfield, NJ vs Cleburne, TX

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in South plainfield, NJ vs Cleburne, TX.

Data South plainfield Cleburne
Population 24,228 33,826
Median Age 41.8 years 35.2 years
Median Income $123,417 $60,929
Married Families 50.0% 39.0%
Poverty Level 6% 11%
Unemployment Rate 4.2 3.9

Population Comparison: South plainfield vs Cleburne

  • The population in Cleburne is higher at 33,826, compared to 24,228 in South plainfield.
  • Residents in South plainfield have a higher median age of 41.8 years compared to 35.2 years in Cleburne.
  • South plainfield has a higher median income of $123,417 compared to $60,929 in Cleburne.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in South plainfield at 50.0% compared to 39.0% in Cleburne.
  • The poverty level is higher in Cleburne at 11%, compared to 6% in South plainfield.
  • The unemployment rate in South plainfield is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.9% in Cleburne.

Demographics

Demographics South plainfield vs Cleburne provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic South plainfield Cleburne
Black 12 6
White 46 52
Asian 17 1
Hispanic 18 29
Two or More Races 7 11
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: South plainfield vs Cleburne

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in South plainfield at 12% compared to 6% in Cleburne.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Cleburne at 52% compared to 46% in South plainfield.
  • The Asian population is larger in South plainfield at 17% compared to 1% in Cleburne.
  • Cleburne has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 29%, compared to 18% in South plainfield.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Cleburne at 11%, compared to 7% in South plainfield.
  • In Cleburne, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in South plainfield.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric South plainfield Cleburne
Mental Health Not Good 14.4% 18.6%
Physical Health Not Good 9.0% 13.3%
Depression 19.0% 23.6%
Smoking 12.0% 20.0%
Binge Drinking 15.2% 17.9%
Obesity 29.0% 37.6%
Disability Percentage 9.0% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: South plainfield vs Cleburne

  • In Cleburne, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 14.4% in South plainfield.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Cleburne at 23.6% versus 19.0% in South plainfield.
  • Cleburne has a higher smoking rate at 20.0% compared to 12.0% in South plainfield.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Cleburne at 17.9% compared to 15.2% in South plainfield.
  • Cleburne has higher obesity rates at 37.6% compared to 29.0% in South plainfield.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Cleburne at 11.0% compared to 9.0% in South plainfield.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level South plainfield Cleburne
No Schooling 1.4% (328) 1.4% (471)
High School Diploma 16.6% (4,012) 17.8% (6,005)
Less than High School 9.0% (2,175) 17.8% (6,010)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 31.5% (7,629) 10.0% (3,384)

Education Levels Comparison: South plainfield vs Cleburne

  • The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both South plainfield and Cleburne at 1.4%.
  • In Cleburne, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.8% compared to 16.6% in South plainfield.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Cleburne at 17.8%, compared to 9.0% in South plainfield.
  • A higher percentage of residents in South plainfield hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.5% compared to 10.0% in Cleburne.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.