Demographics details for South pasadena, CA vs Central city, KY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in South pasadena, CA vs Central city, KY.
Data | South pasadena | Central city |
---|---|---|
Population | 25,850 | 5,810 |
Median Age | 40.6 years | 33.5 years |
Median Income | $127,882 | $52,184 |
Married Families | 45.0% | 38.0% |
Poverty Level | 8% | 16% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.1 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: South pasadena vs Central city
- In South pasadena, the population is higher at 25,850, compared to 5,810 in Central city.
- Residents in South pasadena have a higher median age of 40.6 years compared to 33.5 years in Central city.
- South pasadena has a higher median income of $127,882 compared to $52,184 in Central city.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in South pasadena at 45.0% compared to 38.0% in Central city.
- The poverty level is higher in Central city at 16%, compared to 8% in South pasadena.
- The unemployment rate in South pasadena is higher at 5.1%, compared to 3.5% in Central city.
Demographics
Demographics South pasadena vs Central city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | South pasadena | Central city |
---|---|---|
Black | 4 | 3 |
White | 31 | 88 |
Asian | 34 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 19 | 2 |
Two or More Races | 12 | 6 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: South pasadena vs Central city
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in South pasadena at 4% compared to 3% in Central city.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Central city at 88% compared to 31% in South pasadena.
- The Asian population is larger in South pasadena at 34% compared to 0% in Central city.
- The Hispanic community is larger in South pasadena at 19% compared to 2% in Central city.
- More residents identify as two or more races in South pasadena at 12% compared to 6% in Central city.
- In Central city, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in South pasadena.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | South pasadena | Central city |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 11.9% | 19.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 7.1% | 15.5% |
Depression | 13.8% | 26.8% |
Smoking | 6.3% | 24.8% |
Binge Drinking | 15.3% | 14.8% |
Obesity | 20.9% | 41.9% |
Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: South pasadena vs Central city
- In Central city, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 11.9% in South pasadena.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Central city at 26.8% versus 13.8% in South pasadena.
- Central city has a higher smoking rate at 24.8% compared to 6.3% in South pasadena.
- Binge drinking is more common in South pasadena at 15.3% compared to 14.8% in Central city.
- Central city has higher obesity rates at 41.9% compared to 20.9% in South pasadena.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Central city at 15.0% compared to 7.0% in South pasadena.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | South pasadena | Central city |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.7% (177) | 1.1% (65) |
High School Diploma | 4.3% (1,111) | 15.4% (897) |
Less than High School | 3.0% (766) | 15.6% (905) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 53.2% (13,751) | 8.3% (480) |
Education Levels Comparison: South pasadena vs Central city
- In Central city, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.7% in South pasadena.
- In Central city, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.4% compared to 4.3% in South pasadena.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Central city at 15.6%, compared to 3.0% in South pasadena.
- A higher percentage of residents in South pasadena hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 53.2% compared to 8.3% in Central city.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.