Demographics details for South lancaster, MA vs Naperville, IL

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in South lancaster, MA vs Naperville, IL.

Data South lancaster Naperville
Population 1,642 149,936
Median Age 39.0 years 39.5 years
Median Income $101,250 $143,754
Married Families 33.0% 49.0%
Poverty Level 6% 5%
Unemployment Rate 2.5 5.6

Population Comparison: South lancaster vs Naperville

  • The population in Naperville is higher at 149,936, compared to 1,642 in South lancaster.
  • The median age in Naperville is higher at 39.5 years, compared to 39.0 years in South lancaster.
  • Naperville has a higher median income of $143,754, compared to $101,250 in South lancaster.
  • In Naperville, the percentage of married families is higher at 49.0%, compared to 33.0% in South lancaster.
  • South lancaster has a higher poverty level at 6% compared to 5% in Naperville.
  • Naperville has a higher unemployment rate at 5.6% compared to 2.5% in South lancaster.

Demographics

Demographics South lancaster vs Naperville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic South lancaster Naperville
Black 1 5
White 86 61
Asian 1 21
Hispanic 7 7
Two or More Races 5 6
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: South lancaster vs Naperville

  • In Naperville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 1% in South lancaster.
  • South lancaster has a higher percentage of White residents at 86% compared to 61% in Naperville.
  • In Naperville, the Asian population stands at 21%, greater than 1% in South lancaster.
  • The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both South lancaster and Naperville at 7%.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Naperville at 6%, compared to 5% in South lancaster.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both South lancaster and Naperville at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric South lancaster Naperville
Mental Health Not Good 16.4% 11.6%
Physical Health Not Good 9.0% 7.1%
Depression 22.5% 16.6%
Smoking 12.9% 9.0%
Binge Drinking 17.6% 16.7%
Obesity 30.2% 28.0%
Disability Percentage 17.0% 6.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: South lancaster vs Naperville

  • More residents in South lancaster report poor mental health at 16.4% compared to 11.6% in Naperville.
  • Depression is more prevalent in South lancaster at 22.5% compared to 16.6% in Naperville.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in South lancaster at 12.9% compared to 9.0% in Naperville.
  • Binge drinking is more common in South lancaster at 17.6% compared to 16.7% in Naperville.
  • Obesity rates are higher in South lancaster at 30.2% compared to 28.0% in Naperville.
  • Disability percentages are higher in South lancaster at 17.0% compared to 6.0% in Naperville.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level South lancaster Naperville
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.5% (742)
High School Diploma 9.0% (148) 5.7% (8,582)
Less than High School 10.4% (170) 2.5% (3,797)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 45.4% (746) 47.8% (71,609)

Education Levels Comparison: South lancaster vs Naperville

  • In Naperville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.0% in South lancaster.
  • A higher percentage of residents in South lancaster hold a high school diploma at 9.0% compared to 5.7% in Naperville.
  • More residents in South lancaster have less than a high school education at 10.4% compared to 2.5% in Naperville.
  • In Naperville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 47.8% compared to 45.4% in South lancaster.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.