Demographics details for South holland, IL vs Coalinga, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in South holland, IL vs Coalinga, CA.
| Data | South holland | Coalinga |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 20,685 | 17,024 |
| Median Age | 42.6 years | 35.0 years |
| Median Income | $79,567 | $68,976 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 6.5 |
Population Comparison: South holland vs Coalinga
- In South holland, the population is higher at 20,685, compared to 17,024 in Coalinga.
- Residents in South holland have a higher median age of 42.6 years compared to 35.0 years in Coalinga.
- South holland has a higher median income of $79,567 compared to $68,976 in Coalinga.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in South holland at 34.0% compared to 31.0% in Coalinga.
- The poverty level is higher in Coalinga at 15%, compared to 10% in South holland.
- Coalinga has a higher unemployment rate at 6.5% compared to 5.2% in South holland.
Demographics
Demographics South holland vs Coalinga provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | South holland | Coalinga |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 83 | 4 |
| White | 8 | 9 |
| Asian | 1 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 65 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 18 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: South holland vs Coalinga
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in South holland at 83% compared to 4% in Coalinga.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Coalinga at 9% compared to 8% in South holland.
- In Coalinga, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in South holland.
- Coalinga has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 65%, compared to 5% in South holland.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Coalinga at 18%, compared to 3% in South holland.
- In Coalinga, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in South holland.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | South holland | Coalinga |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.8% | 16.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.9% | 13.9% |
| Depression | 15.1% | 16.4% |
| Smoking | 15.3% | 17.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.6% | 15.9% |
| Obesity | 37.3% | 39.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: South holland vs Coalinga
- In Coalinga, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.9% compared to 14.8% in South holland.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Coalinga at 16.4% versus 15.1% in South holland.
- Coalinga has a higher smoking rate at 17.2% compared to 15.3% in South holland.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Coalinga at 15.9% compared to 15.6% in South holland.
- Coalinga has higher obesity rates at 39.1% compared to 37.3% in South holland.
- Disability percentages are the same in both South holland and Coalinga at 13.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | South holland | Coalinga |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (94) | 3.2% (537) |
| High School Diploma | 15.5% (3,210) | 13.8% (2,349) |
| Less than High School | 7.8% (1,623) | 39.2% (6,672) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 20.0% (4,142) | 8.1% (1,380) |
Education Levels Comparison: South holland vs Coalinga
- In Coalinga, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.2% compared to 0.5% in South holland.
- A higher percentage of residents in South holland hold a high school diploma at 15.5% compared to 13.8% in Coalinga.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Coalinga at 39.2%, compared to 7.8% in South holland.
- A higher percentage of residents in South holland hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.0% compared to 8.1% in Coalinga.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.