Demographics details for Somers, MT vs Spanish fork, UT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Somers, MT vs Spanish fork, UT.
Data | Somers | Spanish fork |
---|---|---|
Population | 1,037 | 44,102 |
Median Age | 64.2 years | 27.4 years |
Median Income | $54,466 | $93,989 |
Married Families | 67.0% | 43.0% |
Poverty Level | 9% | 6% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.8 |
Population Comparison: Somers vs Spanish fork
- The population in Spanish fork is higher at 44,102, compared to 1,037 in Somers.
- Residents in Somers have a higher median age of 64.2 years compared to 27.4 years in Spanish fork.
- Spanish fork has a higher median income of $93,989, compared to $54,466 in Somers.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Somers at 67.0% compared to 43.0% in Spanish fork.
- Somers has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 6% in Spanish fork.
- Spanish fork has a higher unemployment rate at 3.8% compared to 3.5% in Somers.
Demographics
Demographics Somers vs Spanish fork provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Somers | Spanish fork |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 1 |
White | 100 | 80 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | Data is updating | 12 |
Two or More Races | Data is updating | 7 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Somers vs Spanish fork
- In Spanish fork, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Somers.
- Somers has a higher percentage of White residents at 100% compared to 80% in Spanish fork.
- Both Somers and Spanish fork have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Spanish fork has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 0% in Somers.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Spanish fork at 7%, compared to 0% in Somers.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Somers and Spanish fork at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Somers | Spanish fork |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.2% | 15.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.2% | 10.8% |
Depression | 22.0% | 23.8% |
Smoking | 15.0% | 7.7% |
Binge Drinking | 21.1% | 8.3% |
Obesity | 31.4% | 31.0% |
Disability Percentage | 61.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Somers vs Spanish fork
- More residents in Somers report poor mental health at 15.2% compared to 15.0% in Spanish fork.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Spanish fork at 23.8% versus 22.0% in Somers.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Somers at 15.0% compared to 7.7% in Spanish fork.
- Binge drinking is more common in Somers at 21.1% compared to 8.3% in Spanish fork.
- Obesity rates are higher in Somers at 31.4% compared to 31.0% in Spanish fork.
- Disability percentages are higher in Somers at 61.0% compared to 8.0% in Spanish fork.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Somers | Spanish fork |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.4% (175) |
High School Diploma | 30.6% (317) | 9.1% (4,010) |
Less than High School | 46.3% (480) | 5.9% (2,583) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 23.4% (243) | 19.4% (8,546) |
Education Levels Comparison: Somers vs Spanish fork
- In Spanish fork, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Somers.
- A higher percentage of residents in Somers hold a high school diploma at 30.6% compared to 9.1% in Spanish fork.
- More residents in Somers have less than a high school education at 46.3% compared to 5.9% in Spanish fork.
- A higher percentage of residents in Somers hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.4% compared to 19.4% in Spanish fork.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.