Demographics details for Siloam springs, AR vs Russell springs, KY

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Siloam springs, AR vs Russell springs, KY.

Data Siloam springs Russell springs
Population 18,654 2,750
Median Age 30.1 years 44.8 years
Median Income $59,911 $34,219
Married Families 38.0% 29.0%
Poverty Level 13% 15%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 4.5

Population Comparison: Siloam springs vs Russell springs

  • In Siloam springs, the population is higher at 18,654, compared to 2,750 in Russell springs.
  • The median age in Russell springs is higher at 44.8 years, compared to 30.1 years in Siloam springs.
  • Siloam springs has a higher median income of $59,911 compared to $34,219 in Russell springs.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Siloam springs at 38.0% compared to 29.0% in Russell springs.
  • The poverty level is higher in Russell springs at 15%, compared to 13% in Siloam springs.
  • Russell springs has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.5% in Siloam springs.

Demographics

Demographics Siloam springs vs Russell springs provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Siloam springs Russell springs
Black 1 1
White 50 88
Asian 3 Data is updating
Hispanic 23 3
Two or More Races 20 8
American Indian 3 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Siloam springs vs Russell springs

  • The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Siloam springs and Russell springs at 1%.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Russell springs at 88% compared to 50% in Siloam springs.
  • The Asian population is larger in Siloam springs at 3% compared to 0% in Russell springs.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Siloam springs at 23% compared to 3% in Russell springs.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Siloam springs at 20% compared to 8% in Russell springs.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Siloam springs at 3% compared to 0% in Russell springs.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Siloam springs Russell springs
Mental Health Not Good 20.0% 20.7%
Physical Health Not Good 15.0% 15.6%
Depression 26.0% 29.0%
Smoking 21.6% 25.6%
Binge Drinking 14.9% 14.5%
Obesity 39.2% 40.3%
Disability Percentage 13.0% 15.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Siloam springs vs Russell springs

  • In Russell springs, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.7% compared to 20.0% in Siloam springs.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Russell springs at 29.0% versus 26.0% in Siloam springs.
  • Russell springs has a higher smoking rate at 25.6% compared to 21.6% in Siloam springs.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Siloam springs at 14.9% compared to 14.5% in Russell springs.
  • Russell springs has higher obesity rates at 40.3% compared to 39.2% in Siloam springs.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Russell springs at 15.0% compared to 13.0% in Siloam springs.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Siloam springs Russell springs
No Schooling 3.7% (681) 0.7% (20)
High School Diploma 13.5% (2,510) 13.6% (375)
Less than High School 17.4% (3,249) 23.3% (642)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 14.4% (2,680) 18.4% (505)

Education Levels Comparison: Siloam springs vs Russell springs

  • A higher percentage of residents in Siloam springs have no formal schooling at 3.7% compared to 0.7% in Russell springs.
  • In Russell springs, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.6% compared to 13.5% in Siloam springs.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Russell springs at 23.3%, compared to 17.4% in Siloam springs.
  • In Russell springs, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.4% compared to 14.4% in Siloam springs.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.