Demographics details for Shubert, NE vs Montezuma, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Shubert, NE vs Montezuma, GA.
Data | Shubert | Montezuma |
---|---|---|
Population | 156 | 2,958 |
Median Age | 58.3 years | 43.2 years |
Median Income | $50,000 | $46,315 |
Married Families | 82.0% | 26.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 19% |
Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 5.1 |
Population Comparison: Shubert vs Montezuma
- The population in Montezuma is higher at 2,958, compared to 156 in Shubert.
- Residents in Shubert have a higher median age of 58.3 years compared to 43.2 years in Montezuma.
- Shubert has a higher median income of $50,000 compared to $46,315 in Montezuma.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Shubert at 82.0% compared to 26.0% in Montezuma.
- The poverty level is higher in Montezuma at 19%, compared to 10% in Shubert.
- Montezuma has a higher unemployment rate at 5.1% compared to 2.5% in Shubert.
Demographics
Demographics Shubert vs Montezuma provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Shubert | Montezuma |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 79 |
White | 92 | 15 |
Asian | Data is updating | 3 |
Hispanic | 4 | 2 |
Two or More Races | 3 | 1 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Shubert vs Montezuma
- In Montezuma, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 79% compared to 1% in Shubert.
- Shubert has a higher percentage of White residents at 92% compared to 15% in Montezuma.
- In Montezuma, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Shubert.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Shubert at 4% compared to 2% in Montezuma.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Shubert at 3% compared to 1% in Montezuma.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Shubert and Montezuma at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Shubert | Montezuma |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 13.1% | 19.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.1% | 15.7% |
Depression | 15.6% | 19.7% |
Smoking | 16.2% | 23.8% |
Binge Drinking | 22.7% | 11.9% |
Obesity | 40.9% | 44.2% |
Disability Percentage | 26.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Shubert vs Montezuma
- In Montezuma, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.8% compared to 13.1% in Shubert.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Montezuma at 19.7% versus 15.6% in Shubert.
- Montezuma has a higher smoking rate at 23.8% compared to 16.2% in Shubert.
- Binge drinking is more common in Shubert at 22.7% compared to 11.9% in Montezuma.
- Montezuma has higher obesity rates at 44.2% compared to 40.9% in Shubert.
- Disability percentages are higher in Shubert at 26.0% compared to 15.0% in Montezuma.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Shubert | Montezuma |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.2% (7) |
High School Diploma | 39.1% (61) | 24.9% (737) |
Less than High School | 51.9% (81) | 11.3% (335) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 28.8% (45) | 11.3% (333) |
Education Levels Comparison: Shubert vs Montezuma
- In Montezuma, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.2% compared to 0.0% in Shubert.
- A higher percentage of residents in Shubert hold a high school diploma at 39.1% compared to 24.9% in Montezuma.
- More residents in Shubert have less than a high school education at 51.9% compared to 11.3% in Montezuma.
- A higher percentage of residents in Shubert hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 28.8% compared to 11.3% in Montezuma.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.