Demographics details for Shreveport, LA vs Gallatin, TN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Shreveport, LA vs Gallatin, TN.
| Data | Shreveport | Gallatin |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 180,153 | 48,194 |
| Median Age | 37.1 years | 37.8 years |
| Median Income | $45,967 | $68,548 |
| Married Families | 29.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 21% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 3.3 |
Population Comparison: Shreveport vs Gallatin
- In Shreveport, the population is higher at 180,153, compared to 48,194 in Gallatin.
- The median age in Gallatin is higher at 37.8 years, compared to 37.1 years in Shreveport.
- Gallatin has a higher median income of $68,548, compared to $45,967 in Shreveport.
- In Gallatin, the percentage of married families is higher at 37.0%, compared to 29.0% in Shreveport.
- Shreveport has a higher poverty level at 21% compared to 13% in Gallatin.
- The unemployment rate in Shreveport is higher at 5.0%, compared to 3.3% in Gallatin.
Demographics
Demographics Shreveport vs Gallatin provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Shreveport | Gallatin |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 58 | 15 |
| White | 33 | 67 |
| Asian | 2 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 9 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Shreveport vs Gallatin
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Shreveport at 58% compared to 15% in Gallatin.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Gallatin at 67% compared to 33% in Shreveport.
- Both Shreveport and Gallatin have the same percentage of Asian residents at 2%.
- Gallatin has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 9%, compared to 3% in Shreveport.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Gallatin at 7%, compared to 4% in Shreveport.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Shreveport and Gallatin at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Shreveport | Gallatin |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.2% | 19.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.4% | 13.2% |
| Depression | 24.4% | 27.7% |
| Smoking | 24.3% | 20.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.2% | 14.7% |
| Obesity | 42.5% | 37.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Shreveport vs Gallatin
- More residents in Shreveport report poor mental health at 20.2% compared to 19.0% in Gallatin.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Gallatin at 27.7% versus 24.4% in Shreveport.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Shreveport at 24.3% compared to 20.8% in Gallatin.
- Binge drinking is more common in Shreveport at 16.2% compared to 14.7% in Gallatin.
- Obesity rates are higher in Shreveport at 42.5% compared to 37.2% in Gallatin.
- Disability percentages are higher in Shreveport at 16.0% compared to 11.0% in Gallatin.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Shreveport | Gallatin |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (2,087) | 1.2% (596) |
| High School Diploma | 18.3% (33,032) | 13.9% (6,695) |
| Less than High School | 11.1% (20,070) | 11.6% (5,600) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.6% (33,461) | 19.6% (9,464) |
Education Levels Comparison: Shreveport vs Gallatin
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Shreveport and Gallatin at 1.2%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Shreveport hold a high school diploma at 18.3% compared to 13.9% in Gallatin.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Gallatin at 11.6%, compared to 11.1% in Shreveport.
- In Gallatin, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.6% compared to 18.6% in Shreveport.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.