Demographics details for Show low, AZ vs Oakland park, FL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Show low, AZ vs Oakland park, FL.
Data | Show low | Oakland park |
---|---|---|
Population | 12,056 | 43,824 |
Median Age | 43.6 years | 39.1 years |
Median Income | $57,406 | $64,989 |
Married Families | 44.0% | 30.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 14% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.1 |
Population Comparison: Show low vs Oakland park
- The population in Oakland park is higher at 43,824, compared to 12,056 in Show low.
- Residents in Show low have a higher median age of 43.6 years compared to 39.1 years in Oakland park.
- Oakland park has a higher median income of $64,989, compared to $57,406 in Show low.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Show low at 44.0% compared to 30.0% in Oakland park.
- The poverty level is higher in Oakland park at 14%, compared to 10% in Show low.
- The unemployment rate in Show low is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.1% in Oakland park.
Demographics
Demographics Show low vs Oakland park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Show low | Oakland park |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 29 |
White | 70 | 20 |
Asian | 1 | 2 |
Hispanic | 18 | 32 |
Two or More Races | 9 | 17 |
American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Show low vs Oakland park
- In Oakland park, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 29% compared to 0% in Show low.
- Show low has a higher percentage of White residents at 70% compared to 20% in Oakland park.
- In Oakland park, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Show low.
- Oakland park has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 32%, compared to 18% in Show low.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Oakland park at 17%, compared to 9% in Show low.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Show low at 2% compared to 0% in Oakland park.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Show low | Oakland park |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.1% | 16.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.4% | 12.2% |
Depression | 20.7% | 17.8% |
Smoking | 14.6% | 20.1% |
Binge Drinking | 17.9% | 15.0% |
Obesity | 32.9% | 31.1% |
Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Show low vs Oakland park
- More residents in Show low report poor mental health at 17.1% compared to 16.3% in Oakland park.
- Depression is more prevalent in Show low at 20.7% compared to 17.8% in Oakland park.
- Oakland park has a higher smoking rate at 20.1% compared to 14.6% in Show low.
- Binge drinking is more common in Show low at 17.9% compared to 15.0% in Oakland park.
- Obesity rates are higher in Show low at 32.9% compared to 31.1% in Oakland park.
- Disability percentages are higher in Show low at 17.0% compared to 11.0% in Oakland park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Show low | Oakland park |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.1% (12) | 1.4% (596) |
High School Diploma | 14.3% (1,726) | 19.8% (8,695) |
Less than High School | 7.0% (844) | 16.2% (7,092) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.1% (2,306) | 20.7% (9,073) |
Education Levels Comparison: Show low vs Oakland park
- In Oakland park, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.1% in Show low.
- In Oakland park, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.8% compared to 14.3% in Show low.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Oakland park at 16.2%, compared to 7.0% in Show low.
- In Oakland park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.7% compared to 19.1% in Show low.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.