Demographics details for Show low, AZ vs Chicago, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Show low, AZ vs Chicago, IL.
Data | Show low | Chicago |
---|---|---|
Population | 12,056 | 2,665,039 |
Median Age | 43.6 years | 35.3 years |
Median Income | $57,406 | $71,673 |
Married Families | 44.0% | 30.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 18% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 7.1 |
Population Comparison: Show low vs Chicago
- The population in Chicago is higher at 2,665,039, compared to 12,056 in Show low.
- Residents in Show low have a higher median age of 43.6 years compared to 35.3 years in Chicago.
- Chicago has a higher median income of $71,673, compared to $57,406 in Show low.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Show low at 44.0% compared to 30.0% in Chicago.
- The poverty level is higher in Chicago at 18%, compared to 10% in Show low.
- Chicago has a higher unemployment rate at 7.1% compared to 4.5% in Show low.
Demographics
Demographics Show low vs Chicago provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Show low | Chicago |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 29 |
White | 70 | 23 |
Asian | 1 | 7 |
Hispanic | 18 | 30 |
Two or More Races | 9 | 10 |
American Indian | 2 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Show low vs Chicago
- In Chicago, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 29% compared to 0% in Show low.
- Show low has a higher percentage of White residents at 70% compared to 23% in Chicago.
- In Chicago, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 1% in Show low.
- Chicago has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 30%, compared to 18% in Show low.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Chicago at 10%, compared to 9% in Show low.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Show low at 2% compared to 1% in Chicago.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Show low | Chicago |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.1% | 14.5% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.4% | 11.6% |
Depression | 20.7% | 16.3% |
Smoking | 14.6% | 15.1% |
Binge Drinking | 17.9% | 16.5% |
Obesity | 32.9% | 34.1% |
Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Show low vs Chicago
- More residents in Show low report poor mental health at 17.1% compared to 14.5% in Chicago.
- Depression is more prevalent in Show low at 20.7% compared to 16.3% in Chicago.
- Chicago has a higher smoking rate at 15.1% compared to 14.6% in Show low.
- Binge drinking is more common in Show low at 17.9% compared to 16.5% in Chicago.
- Chicago has higher obesity rates at 34.1% compared to 32.9% in Show low.
- Disability percentages are higher in Show low at 17.0% compared to 11.0% in Chicago.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Show low | Chicago |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.1% (12) | 1.7% (44,697) |
High School Diploma | 14.3% (1,726) | 13.3% (354,780) |
Less than High School | 7.0% (844) | 15.8% (419,784) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.1% (2,306) | 30.4% (811,024) |
Education Levels Comparison: Show low vs Chicago
- In Chicago, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.1% in Show low.
- A higher percentage of residents in Show low hold a high school diploma at 14.3% compared to 13.3% in Chicago.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Chicago at 15.8%, compared to 7.0% in Show low.
- In Chicago, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.4% compared to 19.1% in Show low.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.