Demographics details for Shirley, NY vs La puente, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Shirley, NY vs La puente, CA.
| Data | Shirley | La puente |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 26,498 | 36,636 |
| Median Age | 40.4 years | 36.4 years |
| Median Income | $109,821 | $77,702 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 5.9 |
Population Comparison: Shirley vs La puente
- The population in La puente is higher at 36,636, compared to 26,498 in Shirley.
- Residents in Shirley have a higher median age of 40.4 years compared to 36.4 years in La puente.
- Shirley has a higher median income of $109,821 compared to $77,702 in La puente.
- In La puente, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 37.0% in Shirley.
- The poverty level is higher in La puente at 12%, compared to 6% in Shirley.
- La puente has a higher unemployment rate at 5.9% compared to 4.2% in Shirley.
Demographics
Demographics Shirley vs La puente provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Shirley | La puente |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 8 | 2 |
| White | 56 | -16 |
| Asian | 5 | 14 |
| Hispanic | 23 | 84 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 13 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 3 |
Demographics Comparison: Shirley vs La puente
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Shirley at 8% compared to 2% in La puente.
- Shirley has a higher percentage of White residents at 56% compared to -16% in La puente.
- In La puente, the Asian population stands at 14%, greater than 5% in Shirley.
- La puente has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 84%, compared to 23% in Shirley.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in La puente at 13%, compared to 8% in Shirley.
- In La puente, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 0% in Shirley.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Shirley | La puente |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.3% | 15.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.7% | 13.4% |
| Depression | 21.1% | 15.3% |
| Smoking | 17.0% | 11.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.0% | 14.5% |
| Obesity | 32.0% | 31.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Shirley vs La puente
- More residents in Shirley report poor mental health at 16.3% compared to 15.8% in La puente.
- Depression is more prevalent in Shirley at 21.1% compared to 15.3% in La puente.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Shirley at 17.0% compared to 11.8% in La puente.
- Binge drinking is more common in Shirley at 16.0% compared to 14.5% in La puente.
- Obesity rates are higher in Shirley at 32.0% compared to 31.6% in La puente.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Shirley and La puente at 10.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Shirley | La puente |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.1% (555) | 5.0% (1,841) |
| High School Diploma | 22.2% (5,874) | 18.6% (6,830) |
| Less than High School | 13.4% (3,542) | 44.3% (16,244) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.4% (3,547) | 8.0% (2,926) |
Education Levels Comparison: Shirley vs La puente
- In La puente, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 5.0% compared to 2.1% in Shirley.
- A higher percentage of residents in Shirley hold a high school diploma at 22.2% compared to 18.6% in La puente.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in La puente at 44.3%, compared to 13.4% in Shirley.
- A higher percentage of residents in Shirley hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.4% compared to 8.0% in La puente.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.