Demographics details for Sherwood, OH vs Gilbert, AZ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sherwood, OH vs Gilbert, AZ.
| Data | Sherwood | Gilbert |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,408 | 275,346 |
| Median Age | 47.1 years | 35.4 years |
| Median Income | $140,788 | $115,179 |
| Married Families | 45.0% | 42.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 6% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.0 |
Population Comparison: Sherwood vs Gilbert
- The population in Gilbert is higher at 275,346, compared to 3,408 in Sherwood.
- Residents in Sherwood have a higher median age of 47.1 years compared to 35.4 years in Gilbert.
- Sherwood has a higher median income of $140,788 compared to $115,179 in Gilbert.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Sherwood at 45.0% compared to 42.0% in Gilbert.
- The poverty level is higher in Gilbert at 6%, compared to 5% in Sherwood.
- The unemployment rate in Sherwood is higher at 3.2%, compared to 3.0% in Gilbert.
Demographics
Demographics Sherwood vs Gilbert provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Sherwood | Gilbert |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 4 |
| White | 91 | 62 |
| Asian | 4 | 6 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 17 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 10 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Sherwood vs Gilbert
- In Gilbert, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 4% compared to 0% in Sherwood.
- Sherwood has a higher percentage of White residents at 91% compared to 62% in Gilbert.
- In Gilbert, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 4% in Sherwood.
- Gilbert has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 17%, compared to 2% in Sherwood.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Gilbert at 10%, compared to 3% in Sherwood.
- In Gilbert, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Sherwood.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Sherwood | Gilbert |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.3% | 15.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.4% | 8.4% |
| Depression | 21.8% | 19.0% |
| Smoking | 12.7% | 11.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 22.8% | 19.1% |
| Obesity | 29.9% | 27.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sherwood vs Gilbert
- In Gilbert, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.2% compared to 14.3% in Sherwood.
- Depression is more prevalent in Sherwood at 21.8% compared to 19.0% in Gilbert.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Sherwood at 12.7% compared to 11.3% in Gilbert.
- Binge drinking is more common in Sherwood at 22.8% compared to 19.1% in Gilbert.
- Obesity rates are higher in Sherwood at 29.9% compared to 27.2% in Gilbert.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Sherwood and Gilbert at 7.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Sherwood | Gilbert |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.5% (1,279) |
| High School Diploma | 12.1% (412) | 8.1% (22,388) |
| Less than High School | 1.5% (52) | 4.0% (10,945) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 41.3% (1,408) | 28.4% (78,297) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sherwood vs Gilbert
- In Gilbert, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.0% in Sherwood.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sherwood hold a high school diploma at 12.1% compared to 8.1% in Gilbert.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Gilbert at 4.0%, compared to 1.5% in Sherwood.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sherwood hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 41.3% compared to 28.4% in Gilbert.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.