Demographics details for Shelbyville, TN vs South portland, ME

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Shelbyville, TN vs South portland, ME.

Data Shelbyville South portland
Population 24,452 27,026
Median Age 31.3 years 41.0 years
Median Income $50,694 $82,489
Married Families 25.0% 38.0%
Poverty Level 15% 7%
Unemployment Rate 3.1 2.4

Population Comparison: Shelbyville vs South portland

  • The population in South portland is higher at 27,026, compared to 24,452 in Shelbyville.
  • The median age in South portland is higher at 41.0 years, compared to 31.3 years in Shelbyville.
  • South portland has a higher median income of $82,489, compared to $50,694 in Shelbyville.
  • In South portland, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 25.0% in Shelbyville.
  • Shelbyville has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 7% in South portland.
  • The unemployment rate in Shelbyville is higher at 3.1%, compared to 2.4% in South portland.

Demographics

Demographics Shelbyville vs South portland provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Shelbyville South portland
Black 11 7
White 51 83
Asian Data is updating 2
Hispanic 24 3
Two or More Races 12 5
American Indian 2 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Shelbyville vs South portland

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Shelbyville at 11% compared to 7% in South portland.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in South portland at 83% compared to 51% in Shelbyville.
  • In South portland, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Shelbyville.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Shelbyville at 24% compared to 3% in South portland.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Shelbyville at 12% compared to 5% in South portland.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Shelbyville at 2% compared to 0% in South portland.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Shelbyville South portland
Mental Health Not Good 20.3% 14.8%
Physical Health Not Good 15.6% 8.5%
Depression 27.5% 23.8%
Smoking 25.2% 12.2%
Binge Drinking 14.3% 20.1%
Obesity 39.4% 26.2%
Disability Percentage 13.0% 13.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Shelbyville vs South portland

  • More residents in Shelbyville report poor mental health at 20.3% compared to 14.8% in South portland.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Shelbyville at 27.5% compared to 23.8% in South portland.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Shelbyville at 25.2% compared to 12.2% in South portland.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in South portland at 20.1% compared to 14.3% in Shelbyville.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Shelbyville at 39.4% compared to 26.2% in South portland.
  • Disability percentages are the same in both Shelbyville and South portland at 13.0%.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Shelbyville South portland
No Schooling 0.8% (185) 0.3% (93)
High School Diploma 21.6% (5,273) 13.2% (3,562)
Less than High School 20.7% (5,051) 4.4% (1,202)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 7.7% (1,889) 35.5% (9,604)

Education Levels Comparison: Shelbyville vs South portland

  • A higher percentage of residents in Shelbyville have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.3% in South portland.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Shelbyville hold a high school diploma at 21.6% compared to 13.2% in South portland.
  • More residents in Shelbyville have less than a high school education at 20.7% compared to 4.4% in South portland.
  • In South portland, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.5% compared to 7.7% in Shelbyville.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.