Demographics details for Shelbyville, KY vs Stuttgart, AR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Shelbyville, KY vs Stuttgart, AR.
| Data | Shelbyville | Stuttgart |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 17,565 | 7,907 |
| Median Age | 37.4 years | 37.8 years |
| Median Income | $74,433 | $59,124 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 18% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Shelbyville vs Stuttgart
- In Shelbyville, the population is higher at 17,565, compared to 7,907 in Stuttgart.
- The median age in Stuttgart is higher at 37.8 years, compared to 37.4 years in Shelbyville.
- Shelbyville has a higher median income of $74,433 compared to $59,124 in Stuttgart.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Shelbyville at 40.0% compared to 39.0% in Stuttgart.
- The poverty level is higher in Stuttgart at 18%, compared to 11% in Shelbyville.
- Stuttgart has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.5% in Shelbyville.
Demographics
Demographics Shelbyville vs Stuttgart provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Shelbyville | Stuttgart |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 9 | 42 |
| White | 61 | 53 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 18 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Shelbyville vs Stuttgart
- In Stuttgart, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 42% compared to 9% in Shelbyville.
- Shelbyville has a higher percentage of White residents at 61% compared to 53% in Stuttgart.
- The Asian population is larger in Shelbyville at 2% compared to 0% in Stuttgart.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Shelbyville at 18% compared to 2% in Stuttgart.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Shelbyville at 10% compared to 3% in Stuttgart.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Shelbyville and Stuttgart at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Shelbyville | Stuttgart |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.0% | 19.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.7% | 14.6% |
| Depression | 26.2% | 24.4% |
| Smoking | 21.7% | 23.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.7% | 13.6% |
| Obesity | 39.4% | 39.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Shelbyville vs Stuttgart
- In Stuttgart, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.8% compared to 19.0% in Shelbyville.
- Depression is more prevalent in Shelbyville at 26.2% compared to 24.4% in Stuttgart.
- Stuttgart has a higher smoking rate at 23.1% compared to 21.7% in Shelbyville.
- Binge drinking is more common in Shelbyville at 14.7% compared to 13.6% in Stuttgart.
- Stuttgart has higher obesity rates at 39.7% compared to 39.4% in Shelbyville.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Stuttgart at 20.0% compared to 12.0% in Shelbyville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Shelbyville | Stuttgart |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.0% (175) | 0.8% (63) |
| High School Diploma | 17.1% (2,996) | 25.5% (2,015) |
| Less than High School | 19.8% (3,478) | 14.5% (1,144) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.2% (3,015) | 12.0% (948) |
Education Levels Comparison: Shelbyville vs Stuttgart
- A higher percentage of residents in Shelbyville have no formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.8% in Stuttgart.
- In Stuttgart, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.5% compared to 17.1% in Shelbyville.
- More residents in Shelbyville have less than a high school education at 19.8% compared to 14.5% in Stuttgart.
- A higher percentage of residents in Shelbyville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.2% compared to 12.0% in Stuttgart.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.