Demographics details for Shelburne falls, MA vs Yuma, AZ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Shelburne falls, MA vs Yuma, AZ.
| Data | Shelburne falls | Yuma |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,699 | 98,527 |
| Median Age | 50.0 years | 32.0 years |
| Median Income | $54,250 | $59,312 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | 17% | 18% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 9.0 |
Population Comparison: Shelburne falls vs Yuma
- The population in Yuma is higher at 98,527, compared to 1,699 in Shelburne falls.
- Residents in Shelburne falls have a higher median age of 50.0 years compared to 32.0 years in Yuma.
- Yuma has a higher median income of $59,312, compared to $54,250 in Shelburne falls.
- In Yuma, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 35.0% in Shelburne falls.
- The poverty level is higher in Yuma at 18%, compared to 17% in Shelburne falls.
- Yuma has a higher unemployment rate at 9.0% compared to 3.2% in Shelburne falls.
Demographics
Demographics Shelburne falls vs Yuma provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Shelburne falls | Yuma |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 2 |
| White | 83 | 13 |
| Asian | 2 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 6 | 61 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 21 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Shelburne falls vs Yuma
- In Yuma, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 0% in Shelburne falls.
- Shelburne falls has a higher percentage of White residents at 83% compared to 13% in Yuma.
- Both Shelburne falls and Yuma have the same percentage of Asian residents at 2%.
- Yuma has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 61%, compared to 6% in Shelburne falls.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Yuma at 21%, compared to 9% in Shelburne falls.
- In Yuma, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Shelburne falls.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Shelburne falls | Yuma |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.2% | 16.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.5% | 13.2% |
| Depression | 24.4% | 19.3% |
| Smoking | 13.6% | 16.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.3% | 17.6% |
| Obesity | 27.0% | 39.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Shelburne falls vs Yuma
- In Yuma, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.8% compared to 16.2% in Shelburne falls.
- Depression is more prevalent in Shelburne falls at 24.4% compared to 19.3% in Yuma.
- Yuma has a higher smoking rate at 16.2% compared to 13.6% in Shelburne falls.
- Binge drinking is more common in Shelburne falls at 19.3% compared to 17.6% in Yuma.
- Yuma has higher obesity rates at 39.5% compared to 27.0% in Shelburne falls.
- Disability percentages are higher in Shelburne falls at 19.0% compared to 12.0% in Yuma.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Shelburne falls | Yuma |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (6) | 1.7% (1,642) |
| High School Diploma | 15.1% (257) | 13.2% (13,054) |
| Less than High School | 8.9% (152) | 19.8% (19,520) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 34.3% (583) | 12.3% (12,116) |
Education Levels Comparison: Shelburne falls vs Yuma
- In Yuma, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.4% in Shelburne falls.
- A higher percentage of residents in Shelburne falls hold a high school diploma at 15.1% compared to 13.2% in Yuma.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Yuma at 19.8%, compared to 8.9% in Shelburne falls.
- A higher percentage of residents in Shelburne falls hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 34.3% compared to 12.3% in Yuma.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.