Demographics details for Shelburne falls, MA vs Palmdale, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Shelburne falls, MA vs Palmdale, CA.

Data Shelburne falls Palmdale
Population 1,699 163,463
Median Age 50.0 years 33.0 years
Median Income $54,250 $78,414
Married Families 35.0% 36.0%
Poverty Level 17% 13%
Unemployment Rate 3.2 8.2

Population Comparison: Shelburne falls vs Palmdale

  • The population in Palmdale is higher at 163,463, compared to 1,699 in Shelburne falls.
  • Residents in Shelburne falls have a higher median age of 50.0 years compared to 33.0 years in Palmdale.
  • Palmdale has a higher median income of $78,414, compared to $54,250 in Shelburne falls.
  • In Palmdale, the percentage of married families is higher at 36.0%, compared to 35.0% in Shelburne falls.
  • Shelburne falls has a higher poverty level at 17% compared to 13% in Palmdale.
  • Palmdale has a higher unemployment rate at 8.2% compared to 3.2% in Shelburne falls.

Demographics

Demographics Shelburne falls vs Palmdale provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Shelburne falls Palmdale
Black Data is updating 13
White 83 1
Asian 2 5
Hispanic 6 64
Two or More Races 9 15
American Indian Data is updating 2

Demographics Comparison: Shelburne falls vs Palmdale

  • In Palmdale, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 13% compared to 0% in Shelburne falls.
  • Shelburne falls has a higher percentage of White residents at 83% compared to 1% in Palmdale.
  • In Palmdale, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 2% in Shelburne falls.
  • Palmdale has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 64%, compared to 6% in Shelburne falls.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Palmdale at 15%, compared to 9% in Shelburne falls.
  • In Palmdale, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Shelburne falls.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Shelburne falls Palmdale
Mental Health Not Good 16.2% 17.4%
Physical Health Not Good 9.5% 13.6%
Depression 24.4% 17.3%
Smoking 13.6% 13.9%
Binge Drinking 19.3% 14.9%
Obesity 27.0% 32.5%
Disability Percentage 19.0% 12.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Shelburne falls vs Palmdale

  • In Palmdale, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.4% compared to 16.2% in Shelburne falls.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Shelburne falls at 24.4% compared to 17.3% in Palmdale.
  • Palmdale has a higher smoking rate at 13.9% compared to 13.6% in Shelburne falls.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Shelburne falls at 19.3% compared to 14.9% in Palmdale.
  • Palmdale has higher obesity rates at 32.5% compared to 27.0% in Shelburne falls.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Shelburne falls at 19.0% compared to 12.0% in Palmdale.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Shelburne falls Palmdale
No Schooling 0.4% (6) 3.0% (4,852)
High School Diploma 15.1% (257) 16.8% (27,440)
Less than High School 8.9% (152) 27.6% (45,106)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 34.3% (583) 10.4% (16,982)

Education Levels Comparison: Shelburne falls vs Palmdale

  • In Palmdale, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.0% compared to 0.4% in Shelburne falls.
  • In Palmdale, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.8% compared to 15.1% in Shelburne falls.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Palmdale at 27.6%, compared to 8.9% in Shelburne falls.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Shelburne falls hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 34.3% compared to 10.4% in Palmdale.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.