Demographics details for Shaver lake, CA vs Lucedale, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Shaver lake, CA vs Lucedale, MS.
| Data | Shaver lake | Lucedale |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 306 | 2,988 |
| Median Age | 66.4 years | 37.3 years |
| Median Income | $125,000 | $35,662 |
| Married Families | 74.0% | 27.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 25% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Shaver lake vs Lucedale
- The population in Lucedale is higher at 2,988, compared to 306 in Shaver lake.
- Residents in Shaver lake have a higher median age of 66.4 years compared to 37.3 years in Lucedale.
- Shaver lake has a higher median income of $125,000 compared to $35,662 in Lucedale.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Shaver lake at 74.0% compared to 27.0% in Lucedale.
- The poverty level is higher in Lucedale at 25%, compared to 6% in Shaver lake.
- Lucedale has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.5% in Shaver lake.
Demographics
Demographics Shaver lake vs Lucedale provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Shaver lake | Lucedale |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 33 |
| White | 68 | 63 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 21 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Shaver lake vs Lucedale
- In Lucedale, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 33% compared to 0% in Shaver lake.
- Shaver lake has a higher percentage of White residents at 68% compared to 63% in Lucedale.
- The Asian population is larger in Shaver lake at 1% compared to 0% in Lucedale.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Shaver lake at 21% compared to 1% in Lucedale.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Shaver lake at 10% compared to 3% in Lucedale.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Shaver lake and Lucedale at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Shaver lake | Lucedale |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.8% | 16.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.5% | 12.9% |
| Depression | 19.0% | 21.3% |
| Smoking | 11.6% | 21.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.4% | 14.7% |
| Obesity | 31.8% | 41.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Shaver lake vs Lucedale
- In Lucedale, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.8% compared to 15.8% in Shaver lake.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Lucedale at 21.3% versus 19.0% in Shaver lake.
- Lucedale has a higher smoking rate at 21.4% compared to 11.6% in Shaver lake.
- Binge drinking is more common in Shaver lake at 18.4% compared to 14.7% in Lucedale.
- Lucedale has higher obesity rates at 41.2% compared to 31.8% in Shaver lake.
- Disability percentages are higher in Shaver lake at 20.0% compared to 12.0% in Lucedale.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Shaver lake | Lucedale |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.6% (18) |
| High School Diploma | 5.6% (17) | 14.1% (421) |
| Less than High School | 2.6% (8) | 21.8% (651) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 54.6% (167) | 11.9% (356) |
Education Levels Comparison: Shaver lake vs Lucedale
- In Lucedale, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.0% in Shaver lake.
- In Lucedale, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.1% compared to 5.6% in Shaver lake.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Lucedale at 21.8%, compared to 2.6% in Shaver lake.
- A higher percentage of residents in Shaver lake hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 54.6% compared to 11.9% in Lucedale.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.