Demographics details for Shaver lake, CA vs Brentwood, TN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Shaver lake, CA vs Brentwood, TN.
Data | Shaver lake | Brentwood |
---|---|---|
Population | 306 | 45,136 |
Median Age | 66.4 years | 43.6 years |
Median Income | $125,000 | $181,576 |
Married Families | 74.0% | 53.0% |
Poverty Level | 6% | Data is updating |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 2.8 |
Population Comparison: Shaver lake vs Brentwood
- The population in Brentwood is higher at 45,136, compared to 306 in Shaver lake.
- Residents in Shaver lake have a higher median age of 66.4 years compared to 43.6 years in Brentwood.
- Brentwood has a higher median income of $181,576, compared to $125,000 in Shaver lake.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Shaver lake at 74.0% compared to 53.0% in Brentwood.
- Shaver lake has a higher poverty level at 6% compared to 0% in Brentwood.
- The unemployment rate in Shaver lake is higher at 3.5%, compared to 2.8% in Brentwood.
Demographics
Demographics Shaver lake vs Brentwood provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Shaver lake | Brentwood |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 3 |
White | 68 | 81 |
Asian | 1 | 8 |
Hispanic | 21 | 4 |
Two or More Races | 10 | 4 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Shaver lake vs Brentwood
- In Brentwood, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 0% in Shaver lake.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Brentwood at 81% compared to 68% in Shaver lake.
- In Brentwood, the Asian population stands at 8%, greater than 1% in Shaver lake.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Shaver lake at 21% compared to 4% in Brentwood.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Shaver lake at 10% compared to 4% in Brentwood.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Shaver lake and Brentwood at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Shaver lake | Brentwood |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.8% | 13.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.5% | 7.4% |
Depression | 19.0% | 22.3% |
Smoking | 11.6% | 9.4% |
Binge Drinking | 18.4% | 17.0% |
Obesity | 31.8% | 25.9% |
Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 5.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Shaver lake vs Brentwood
- More residents in Shaver lake report poor mental health at 15.8% compared to 13.0% in Brentwood.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Brentwood at 22.3% versus 19.0% in Shaver lake.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Shaver lake at 11.6% compared to 9.4% in Brentwood.
- Binge drinking is more common in Shaver lake at 18.4% compared to 17.0% in Brentwood.
- Obesity rates are higher in Shaver lake at 31.8% compared to 25.9% in Brentwood.
- Disability percentages are higher in Shaver lake at 20.0% compared to 5.0% in Brentwood.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Shaver lake | Brentwood |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.3% (150) |
High School Diploma | 5.6% (17) | 4.1% (1,854) |
Less than High School | 2.6% (8) | 2.1% (970) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 54.6% (167) | 48.2% (21,744) |
Education Levels Comparison: Shaver lake vs Brentwood
- In Brentwood, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.0% in Shaver lake.
- A higher percentage of residents in Shaver lake hold a high school diploma at 5.6% compared to 4.1% in Brentwood.
- More residents in Shaver lake have less than a high school education at 2.6% compared to 2.1% in Brentwood.
- A higher percentage of residents in Shaver lake hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 54.6% compared to 48.2% in Brentwood.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.