Demographics details for Sharpsville, PA vs Tacoma, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sharpsville, PA vs Tacoma, WA.
| Data | Sharpsville | Tacoma |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,189 | 221,776 |
| Median Age | 45.4 years | 36.9 years |
| Median Income | $52,668 | $79,085 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.9 |
Population Comparison: Sharpsville vs Tacoma
- The population in Tacoma is higher at 221,776, compared to 4,189 in Sharpsville.
- Residents in Sharpsville have a higher median age of 45.4 years compared to 36.9 years in Tacoma.
- Tacoma has a higher median income of $79,085, compared to $52,668 in Sharpsville.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Sharpsville at 37.0% compared to 36.0% in Tacoma.
- The poverty level is higher in Tacoma at 11%, compared to 9% in Sharpsville.
- Tacoma has a higher unemployment rate at 4.9% compared to 4.5% in Sharpsville.
Demographics
Demographics Sharpsville vs Tacoma provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Sharpsville | Tacoma |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | 11 |
| White | 92 | 53 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 9 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 12 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 13 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Sharpsville vs Tacoma
- In Tacoma, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 11% compared to 4% in Sharpsville.
- Sharpsville has a higher percentage of White residents at 92% compared to 53% in Tacoma.
- In Tacoma, the Asian population stands at 9%, greater than 0% in Sharpsville.
- Tacoma has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 3% in Sharpsville.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Tacoma at 13%, compared to 1% in Sharpsville.
- In Tacoma, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Sharpsville.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Sharpsville | Tacoma |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.5% | 18.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.4% | 11.9% |
| Depression | 24.9% | 26.2% |
| Smoking | 20.7% | 15.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.4% | 16.2% |
| Obesity | 40.3% | 34.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 29.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sharpsville vs Tacoma
- In Tacoma, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 18.5% in Sharpsville.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Tacoma at 26.2% versus 24.9% in Sharpsville.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Sharpsville at 20.7% compared to 15.4% in Tacoma.
- Binge drinking is more common in Sharpsville at 18.4% compared to 16.2% in Tacoma.
- Obesity rates are higher in Sharpsville at 40.3% compared to 34.6% in Tacoma.
- Disability percentages are higher in Sharpsville at 29.0% compared to 14.0% in Tacoma.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Sharpsville | Tacoma |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.1% (48) | 1.6% (3,474) |
| High School Diploma | 26.9% (1,128) | 14.2% (31,504) |
| Less than High School | 12.9% (540) | 10.1% (22,501) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.7% (698) | 23.0% (50,913) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sharpsville vs Tacoma
- In Tacoma, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 1.1% in Sharpsville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sharpsville hold a high school diploma at 26.9% compared to 14.2% in Tacoma.
- More residents in Sharpsville have less than a high school education at 12.9% compared to 10.1% in Tacoma.
- In Tacoma, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.0% compared to 16.7% in Sharpsville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.