Demographics details for Sharon, PA vs Victorville, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sharon, PA vs Victorville, CA.
| Data | Sharon | Victorville |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 12,952 | 137,221 |
| Median Age | 43.8 years | 31.8 years |
| Median Income | $40,089 | $65,746 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 6.5 | 7.5 |
Population Comparison: Sharon vs Victorville
- The population in Victorville is higher at 137,221, compared to 12,952 in Sharon.
- Residents in Sharon have a higher median age of 43.8 years compared to 31.8 years in Victorville.
- Victorville has a higher median income of $65,746, compared to $40,089 in Sharon.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Sharon and Victorville at 31.0%.
- The poverty level is identical in both Sharon and Victorville at 12%.
- Victorville has a higher unemployment rate at 7.5% compared to 6.5% in Sharon.
Demographics
Demographics Sharon vs Victorville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Sharon | Victorville |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 14 | 17 |
| White | 78 | 4 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 4 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 54 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 19 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Sharon vs Victorville
- In Victorville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 17% compared to 14% in Sharon.
- Sharon has a higher percentage of White residents at 78% compared to 4% in Victorville.
- In Victorville, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 0% in Sharon.
- Victorville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 54%, compared to 2% in Sharon.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Victorville at 19%, compared to 6% in Sharon.
- In Victorville, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Sharon.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Sharon | Victorville |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.5% | 18.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.0% | 14.4% |
| Depression | 25.4% | 19.0% |
| Smoking | 25.4% | 16.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.6% | 14.8% |
| Obesity | 44.5% | 41.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 25.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sharon vs Victorville
- More residents in Sharon report poor mental health at 20.5% compared to 18.4% in Victorville.
- Depression is more prevalent in Sharon at 25.4% compared to 19.0% in Victorville.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Sharon at 25.4% compared to 16.2% in Victorville.
- Binge drinking is more common in Sharon at 16.6% compared to 14.8% in Victorville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Sharon at 44.5% compared to 41.3% in Victorville.
- Disability percentages are higher in Sharon at 25.0% compared to 13.0% in Victorville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Sharon | Victorville |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (90) | 1.7% (2,334) |
| High School Diploma | 28.0% (3,624) | 15.1% (20,711) |
| Less than High School | 13.7% (1,780) | 24.1% (33,076) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.1% (1,958) | 6.6% (9,125) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sharon vs Victorville
- In Victorville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.7% in Sharon.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sharon hold a high school diploma at 28.0% compared to 15.1% in Victorville.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Victorville at 24.1%, compared to 13.7% in Sharon.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sharon hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.1% compared to 6.6% in Victorville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.