Demographics details for Shafer, MN vs Lubbock, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Shafer, MN vs Lubbock, TX.
| Data | Shafer | Lubbock |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,188 | 263,930 |
| Median Age | 30.7 years | 30.0 years |
| Median Income | $92,321 | $58,734 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 16% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.1 |
Population Comparison: Shafer vs Lubbock
- The population in Lubbock is higher at 263,930, compared to 1,188 in Shafer.
- Residents in Shafer have a higher median age of 30.7 years compared to 30.0 years in Lubbock.
- Shafer has a higher median income of $92,321 compared to $58,734 in Lubbock.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Shafer and Lubbock at 32.0%.
- The poverty level is higher in Lubbock at 16%, compared to 0% in Shafer.
- Lubbock has a higher unemployment rate at 4.1% compared to 3.5% in Shafer.
Demographics
Demographics Shafer vs Lubbock provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Shafer | Lubbock |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 8 |
| White | 84 | 38 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 3 |
| Hispanic | 8 | 37 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 13 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Shafer vs Lubbock
- In Lubbock, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 8% compared to 0% in Shafer.
- Shafer has a higher percentage of White residents at 84% compared to 38% in Lubbock.
- In Lubbock, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Shafer.
- Lubbock has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 37%, compared to 8% in Shafer.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Lubbock at 13%, compared to 7% in Shafer.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Shafer and Lubbock at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Shafer | Lubbock |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.4% | 18.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.1% | 12.3% |
| Depression | 23.5% | 24.6% |
| Smoking | 18.0% | 17.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.9% | 18.2% |
| Obesity | 37.0% | 40.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Shafer vs Lubbock
- In Lubbock, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.7% compared to 15.4% in Shafer.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Lubbock at 24.6% versus 23.5% in Shafer.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Shafer at 18.0% compared to 17.6% in Lubbock.
- Binge drinking is more common in Shafer at 20.9% compared to 18.2% in Lubbock.
- Lubbock has higher obesity rates at 40.3% compared to 37.0% in Shafer.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Lubbock at 12.0% compared to 8.0% in Shafer.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Shafer | Lubbock |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (9) | 1.0% (2,543) |
| High School Diploma | 14.4% (171) | 11.1% (29,368) |
| Less than High School | 5.9% (70) | 12.3% (32,334) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.5% (125) | 19.5% (51,422) |
Education Levels Comparison: Shafer vs Lubbock
- In Lubbock, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.8% in Shafer.
- A higher percentage of residents in Shafer hold a high school diploma at 14.4% compared to 11.1% in Lubbock.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Lubbock at 12.3%, compared to 5.9% in Shafer.
- In Lubbock, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.5% compared to 10.5% in Shafer.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.