Demographics details for Seneca, SC vs Lawrence, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Seneca, SC vs Lawrence, KS.
| Data | Seneca | Lawrence |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 8,979 | 95,794 |
| Median Age | 44.0 years | 28.8 years |
| Median Income | $48,108 | $59,834 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.6 | 3.9 |
Population Comparison: Seneca vs Lawrence
- The population in Lawrence is higher at 95,794, compared to 8,979 in Seneca.
- Residents in Seneca have a higher median age of 44.0 years compared to 28.8 years in Lawrence.
- Lawrence has a higher median income of $59,834, compared to $48,108 in Seneca.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Seneca at 33.0% compared to 32.0% in Lawrence.
- The poverty level is identical in both Seneca and Lawrence at 12%.
- Lawrence has a higher unemployment rate at 3.9% compared to 3.6% in Seneca.
Demographics
Demographics Seneca vs Lawrence provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Seneca | Lawrence |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 18 | 5 |
| White | 66 | 71 |
| Asian | 1 | 6 |
| Hispanic | 8 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Seneca vs Lawrence
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Seneca at 18% compared to 5% in Lawrence.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Lawrence at 71% compared to 66% in Seneca.
- In Lawrence, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 1% in Seneca.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Seneca at 8% compared to 7% in Lawrence.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Lawrence at 9%, compared to 7% in Seneca.
- In Lawrence, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Seneca.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Seneca | Lawrence |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.3% | 16.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.6% | 9.5% |
| Depression | 22.1% | 22.3% |
| Smoking | 19.8% | 14.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.7% | 19.6% |
| Obesity | 37.7% | 32.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Seneca vs Lawrence
- More residents in Seneca report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 16.5% in Lawrence.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Lawrence at 22.3% versus 22.1% in Seneca.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Seneca at 19.8% compared to 14.8% in Lawrence.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Lawrence at 19.6% compared to 16.7% in Seneca.
- Obesity rates are higher in Seneca at 37.7% compared to 32.8% in Lawrence.
- Disability percentages are higher in Seneca at 20.0% compared to 10.0% in Lawrence.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Seneca | Lawrence |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (62) | 0.5% (466) |
| High School Diploma | 17.4% (1,563) | 8.2% (7,882) |
| Less than High School | 19.0% (1,704) | 4.0% (3,784) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.1% (1,718) | 31.1% (29,776) |
Education Levels Comparison: Seneca vs Lawrence
- A higher percentage of residents in Seneca have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.5% in Lawrence.
- A higher percentage of residents in Seneca hold a high school diploma at 17.4% compared to 8.2% in Lawrence.
- More residents in Seneca have less than a high school education at 19.0% compared to 4.0% in Lawrence.
- In Lawrence, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.1% compared to 19.1% in Seneca.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.