Demographics details for Seaside park, NJ vs Chowchilla, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Seaside park, NJ vs Chowchilla, CA.
Data | Seaside park | Chowchilla |
---|---|---|
Population | 1,473 | 18,738 |
Median Age | 59.5 years | 34.1 years |
Median Income | $80,658 | $67,212 |
Married Families | 57.0% | 26.0% |
Poverty Level | 5% | 19% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.1 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Seaside park vs Chowchilla
- The population in Chowchilla is higher at 18,738, compared to 1,473 in Seaside park.
- Residents in Seaside park have a higher median age of 59.5 years compared to 34.1 years in Chowchilla.
- Seaside park has a higher median income of $80,658 compared to $67,212 in Chowchilla.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Seaside park at 57.0% compared to 26.0% in Chowchilla.
- The poverty level is higher in Chowchilla at 19%, compared to 5% in Seaside park.
- Chowchilla has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 4.1% in Seaside park.
Demographics
Demographics Seaside park vs Chowchilla provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Seaside park | Chowchilla |
---|---|---|
Black | 3 | 6 |
White | 90 | 29 |
Asian | 4 | 6 |
Hispanic | 1 | 48 |
Two or More Races | 2 | 9 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Seaside park vs Chowchilla
- In Chowchilla, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 3% in Seaside park.
- Seaside park has a higher percentage of White residents at 90% compared to 29% in Chowchilla.
- In Chowchilla, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 4% in Seaside park.
- Chowchilla has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 48%, compared to 1% in Seaside park.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Chowchilla at 9%, compared to 2% in Seaside park.
- In Chowchilla, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Seaside park.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Seaside park | Chowchilla |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.4% | 20.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.1% | 15.1% |
Depression | 23.1% | 23.3% |
Smoking | 13.2% | 18.3% |
Binge Drinking | 18.2% | 13.7% |
Obesity | 30.7% | 36.7% |
Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Seaside park vs Chowchilla
- In Chowchilla, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.9% compared to 15.4% in Seaside park.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Chowchilla at 23.3% versus 23.1% in Seaside park.
- Chowchilla has a higher smoking rate at 18.3% compared to 13.2% in Seaside park.
- Binge drinking is more common in Seaside park at 18.2% compared to 13.7% in Chowchilla.
- Chowchilla has higher obesity rates at 36.7% compared to 30.7% in Seaside park.
- Disability percentages are higher in Seaside park at 13.0% compared to 7.0% in Chowchilla.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Seaside park | Chowchilla |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.4% (271) |
High School Diploma | 22.2% (327) | 14.6% (2,738) |
Less than High School | 3.3% (49) | 31.2% (5,842) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 56.3% (830) | 9.2% (1,731) |
Education Levels Comparison: Seaside park vs Chowchilla
- In Chowchilla, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.0% in Seaside park.
- A higher percentage of residents in Seaside park hold a high school diploma at 22.2% compared to 14.6% in Chowchilla.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Chowchilla at 31.2%, compared to 3.3% in Seaside park.
- A higher percentage of residents in Seaside park hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 56.3% compared to 9.2% in Chowchilla.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.