Demographics details for Scott depot, WV vs Brundidge, AL

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Scott depot, WV vs Brundidge, AL.

Data Scott depot Brundidge
Population 11,877 2,034
Median Age 42.1 years 49.9 years
Median Income $75,904 $37,627
Married Families 54.0% 39.0%
Poverty Level Data is updating 20%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 4.0

Population Comparison: Scott depot vs Brundidge

  • In Scott depot, the population is higher at 11,877, compared to 2,034 in Brundidge.
  • The median age in Brundidge is higher at 49.9 years, compared to 42.1 years in Scott depot.
  • Scott depot has a higher median income of $75,904 compared to $37,627 in Brundidge.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Scott depot at 54.0% compared to 39.0% in Brundidge.
  • The poverty level is higher in Brundidge at 20%, compared to 0% in Scott depot.
  • Brundidge has a higher unemployment rate at 4.0% compared to 3.5% in Scott depot.

Demographics

Demographics Scott depot vs Brundidge provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Scott depot Brundidge
Black 1 67
White 95 12
Asian 2 Data is updating
Hispanic 1 16
Two or More Races 1 5
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Scott depot vs Brundidge

  • In Brundidge, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 67% compared to 1% in Scott depot.
  • Scott depot has a higher percentage of White residents at 95% compared to 12% in Brundidge.
  • The Asian population is larger in Scott depot at 2% compared to 0% in Brundidge.
  • Brundidge has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 16%, compared to 1% in Scott depot.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Brundidge at 5%, compared to 1% in Scott depot.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Scott depot and Brundidge at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Scott depot Brundidge
Mental Health Not Good Data is updating% 20.5%
Physical Health Not Good Data is updating% 15.2%
Depression Data is updating% 20.7%
Smoking Data is updating% 23.1%
Binge Drinking Data is updating% 12.2%
Obesity Data is updating% 45.7%
Disability Percentage 11.0% 25.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Scott depot vs Brundidge

  • In Brundidge, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.5% compared to 0.0% in Scott depot.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Brundidge at 20.7% versus 0.0% in Scott depot.
  • Brundidge has a higher smoking rate at 23.1% compared to 0.0% in Scott depot.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Brundidge at 12.2% compared to 0.0% in Scott depot.
  • Brundidge has higher obesity rates at 45.7% compared to 0.0% in Scott depot.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Brundidge at 25.0% compared to 11.0% in Scott depot.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Scott depot Brundidge
No Schooling 0.4% (53) 0.5% (11)
High School Diploma 18.8% (2,233) 35.9% (731)
Less than High School 5.8% (691) 22.7% (461)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 24.1% (2,867) 11.8% (240)

Education Levels Comparison: Scott depot vs Brundidge

  • In Brundidge, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.4% in Scott depot.
  • In Brundidge, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 35.9% compared to 18.8% in Scott depot.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Brundidge at 22.7%, compared to 5.8% in Scott depot.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Scott depot hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.1% compared to 11.8% in Brundidge.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.