Demographics details for Savannah, TN vs Cleburne, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Savannah, TN vs Cleburne, TX.
| Data | Savannah | Cleburne |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 7,262 | 33,826 |
| Median Age | 36.3 years | 35.2 years |
| Median Income | $40,200 | $60,929 |
| Married Families | 30.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.9 |
Population Comparison: Savannah vs Cleburne
- The population in Cleburne is higher at 33,826, compared to 7,262 in Savannah.
- Residents in Savannah have a higher median age of 36.3 years compared to 35.2 years in Cleburne.
- Cleburne has a higher median income of $60,929, compared to $40,200 in Savannah.
- In Cleburne, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 30.0% in Savannah.
- Savannah has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 11% in Cleburne.
- The unemployment rate in Savannah is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.9% in Cleburne.
Demographics
Demographics Savannah vs Cleburne provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Savannah | Cleburne |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 6 | 6 |
| White | 80 | 52 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 8 | 29 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 11 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Savannah vs Cleburne
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Savannah and Cleburne at 6%.
- Savannah has a higher percentage of White residents at 80% compared to 52% in Cleburne.
- In Cleburne, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Savannah.
- Cleburne has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 29%, compared to 8% in Savannah.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Cleburne at 11%, compared to 6% in Savannah.
- In Cleburne, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Savannah.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Savannah | Cleburne |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 21.8% | 18.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 16.1% | 13.3% |
| Depression | 31.7% | 23.6% |
| Smoking | 26.7% | 20.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.3% | 17.9% |
| Obesity | 39.3% | 37.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Savannah vs Cleburne
- More residents in Savannah report poor mental health at 21.8% compared to 18.6% in Cleburne.
- Depression is more prevalent in Savannah at 31.7% compared to 23.6% in Cleburne.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Savannah at 26.7% compared to 20.0% in Cleburne.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Cleburne at 17.9% compared to 14.3% in Savannah.
- Obesity rates are higher in Savannah at 39.3% compared to 37.6% in Cleburne.
- Disability percentages are higher in Savannah at 15.0% compared to 11.0% in Cleburne.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Savannah | Cleburne |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (42) | 1.4% (471) |
| High School Diploma | 25.5% (1,854) | 17.8% (6,005) |
| Less than High School | 15.1% (1,100) | 17.8% (6,010) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 6.8% (496) | 10.0% (3,384) |
Education Levels Comparison: Savannah vs Cleburne
- In Cleburne, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.6% in Savannah.
- A higher percentage of residents in Savannah hold a high school diploma at 25.5% compared to 17.8% in Cleburne.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Cleburne at 17.8%, compared to 15.1% in Savannah.
- In Cleburne, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.0% compared to 6.8% in Savannah.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.