Demographics details for Sanford, FL vs Washington, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sanford, FL vs Washington, NC.
| Data | Sanford | Washington |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 63,154 | 10,828 |
| Median Age | 35.6 years | 48.0 years |
| Median Income | $59,181 | $38,927 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 16% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 4.8 |
Population Comparison: Sanford vs Washington
- In Sanford, the population is higher at 63,154, compared to 10,828 in Washington.
- The median age in Washington is higher at 48.0 years, compared to 35.6 years in Sanford.
- Sanford has a higher median income of $59,181 compared to $38,927 in Washington.
- In Washington, the percentage of married families is higher at 34.0%, compared to 31.0% in Sanford.
- The poverty level is higher in Washington at 16%, compared to 12% in Sanford.
- Washington has a higher unemployment rate at 4.8% compared to 4.0% in Sanford.
Demographics
Demographics Sanford vs Washington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Sanford | Washington |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 26 | 49 |
| White | 31 | 41 |
| Asian | 4 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 26 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 13 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Sanford vs Washington
- In Washington, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 49% compared to 26% in Sanford.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Washington at 41% compared to 31% in Sanford.
- The Asian population is larger in Sanford at 4% compared to 0% in Washington.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Sanford at 26% compared to 6% in Washington.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Sanford at 13% compared to 3% in Washington.
- In Washington, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Sanford.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Sanford | Washington |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.5% | 18.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.1% | 13.8% |
| Depression | 18.9% | 22.8% |
| Smoking | 19.9% | 21.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.9% | 14.7% |
| Obesity | 34.4% | 43.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 24.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sanford vs Washington
- In Washington, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 16.5% in Sanford.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Washington at 22.8% versus 18.9% in Sanford.
- Washington has a higher smoking rate at 21.9% compared to 19.9% in Sanford.
- Binge drinking is more common in Sanford at 15.9% compared to 14.7% in Washington.
- Washington has higher obesity rates at 43.3% compared to 34.4% in Sanford.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Washington at 24.0% compared to 11.0% in Sanford.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Sanford | Washington |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (389) | 1.2% (128) |
| High School Diploma | 19.0% (11,984) | 19.0% (2,058) |
| Less than High School | 11.1% (7,010) | 13.7% (1,487) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.9% (10,683) | 10.3% (1,118) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sanford vs Washington
- In Washington, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.6% in Sanford.
- Both cities have the same percentage of residents with high school diplomas at 19.0%.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Washington at 13.7%, compared to 11.1% in Sanford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sanford hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.9% compared to 10.3% in Washington.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.