Demographics details for Sandy, UT vs Loves park, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sandy, UT vs Loves park, IL.
Data | Sandy | Loves park |
---|---|---|
Population | 93,022 | 23,365 |
Median Age | 36.9 years | 36.6 years |
Median Income | $108,165 | $56,370 |
Married Families | 47.0% | 35.0% |
Poverty Level | 6% | 9% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.6 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: Sandy vs Loves park
- In Sandy, the population is higher at 93,022, compared to 23,365 in Loves park.
- Residents in Sandy have a higher median age of 36.9 years compared to 36.6 years in Loves park.
- Sandy has a higher median income of $108,165 compared to $56,370 in Loves park.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Sandy at 47.0% compared to 35.0% in Loves park.
- The poverty level is higher in Loves park at 9%, compared to 6% in Sandy.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Sandy and Loves park at 3.6%.
Demographics
Demographics Sandy vs Loves park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Sandy | Loves park |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 7 |
White | 77 | 71 |
Asian | 4 | 3 |
Hispanic | 11 | 10 |
Two or More Races | 6 | 9 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Sandy vs Loves park
- In Loves park, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 7% compared to 1% in Sandy.
- Sandy has a higher percentage of White residents at 77% compared to 71% in Loves park.
- The Asian population is larger in Sandy at 4% compared to 3% in Loves park.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Sandy at 11% compared to 10% in Loves park.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Loves park at 9%, compared to 6% in Sandy.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Sandy at 1% compared to 0% in Loves park.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Sandy | Loves park |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.1% | 16.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.4% | 11.3% |
Depression | 26.7% | 21.3% |
Smoking | 7.8% | 17.0% |
Binge Drinking | 16.4% | 17.0% |
Obesity | 29.0% | 39.4% |
Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sandy vs Loves park
- More residents in Sandy report poor mental health at 17.1% compared to 16.3% in Loves park.
- Depression is more prevalent in Sandy at 26.7% compared to 21.3% in Loves park.
- Loves park has a higher smoking rate at 17.0% compared to 7.8% in Sandy.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Loves park at 17.0% compared to 16.4% in Sandy.
- Loves park has higher obesity rates at 39.4% compared to 29.0% in Sandy.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Loves park at 14.0% compared to 9.0% in Sandy.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Sandy | Loves park |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.5% (424) | 0.4% (97) |
High School Diploma | 10.9% (10,176) | 17.1% (3,994) |
Less than High School | 5.7% (5,337) | 9.7% (2,262) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 30.5% (28,394) | 17.4% (4,064) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sandy vs Loves park
- A higher percentage of residents in Sandy have no formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.4% in Loves park.
- In Loves park, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.1% compared to 10.9% in Sandy.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Loves park at 9.7%, compared to 5.7% in Sandy.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sandy hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.5% compared to 17.4% in Loves park.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.