Demographics details for Sandersville, GA vs Winona, MS

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Sandersville, GA vs Winona, MS.

Data Sandersville Winona
Population 5,538 4,159
Median Age 36.1 years 33.7 years
Median Income $45,502 $26,250
Married Families 26.0% 21.0%
Poverty Level 16% 24%
Unemployment Rate 4.2 3.6

Population Comparison: Sandersville vs Winona

  • In Sandersville, the population is higher at 5,538, compared to 4,159 in Winona.
  • Residents in Sandersville have a higher median age of 36.1 years compared to 33.7 years in Winona.
  • Sandersville has a higher median income of $45,502 compared to $26,250 in Winona.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Sandersville at 26.0% compared to 21.0% in Winona.
  • The poverty level is higher in Winona at 24%, compared to 16% in Sandersville.
  • The unemployment rate in Sandersville is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.6% in Winona.

Demographics

Demographics Sandersville vs Winona provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Sandersville Winona
Black 59 62
White 31 38
Asian 2 Data is updating
Hispanic 1 Data is updating
Two or More Races 7 Data is updating
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Sandersville vs Winona

  • In Winona, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 62% compared to 59% in Sandersville.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Winona at 38% compared to 31% in Sandersville.
  • The Asian population is larger in Sandersville at 2% compared to 0% in Winona.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Sandersville at 1% compared to 0% in Winona.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Sandersville at 7% compared to 0% in Winona.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Sandersville and Winona at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Sandersville Winona
Mental Health Not Good 19.1% 19.3%
Physical Health Not Good 14.5% 15.0%
Depression 20.7% 22.3%
Smoking 22.1% 24.8%
Binge Drinking 13.3% 11.8%
Obesity 43.4% 46.4%
Disability Percentage 15.0% 25.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Sandersville vs Winona

  • In Winona, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 19.1% in Sandersville.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Winona at 22.3% versus 20.7% in Sandersville.
  • Winona has a higher smoking rate at 24.8% compared to 22.1% in Sandersville.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Sandersville at 13.3% compared to 11.8% in Winona.
  • Winona has higher obesity rates at 46.4% compared to 43.4% in Sandersville.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Winona at 25.0% compared to 15.0% in Sandersville.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Sandersville Winona
No Schooling 0.7% (39) 2.1% (87)
High School Diploma 22.3% (1,233) 11.4% (473)
Less than High School 17.1% (949) 28.5% (1,186)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 12.2% (678) 9.3% (388)

Education Levels Comparison: Sandersville vs Winona

  • In Winona, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 0.7% in Sandersville.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Sandersville hold a high school diploma at 22.3% compared to 11.4% in Winona.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Winona at 28.5%, compared to 17.1% in Sandersville.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Sandersville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.2% compared to 9.3% in Winona.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.