Demographics details for Sanborn, NY vs Cleburne, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sanborn, NY vs Cleburne, TX.
Data | Sanborn | Cleburne |
---|---|---|
Population | 1,499 | 33,826 |
Median Age | 35.2 years | 35.2 years |
Median Income | $75,109 | $60,929 |
Married Families | 34.0% | 39.0% |
Poverty Level | 9% | 11% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.9 |
Population Comparison: Sanborn vs Cleburne
- The population in Cleburne is higher at 33,826, compared to 1,499 in Sanborn.
- The median age is the same in both Sanborn and Cleburne at 35.2 years.
- Sanborn has a higher median income of $75,109 compared to $60,929 in Cleburne.
- In Cleburne, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 34.0% in Sanborn.
- The poverty level is higher in Cleburne at 11%, compared to 9% in Sanborn.
- The unemployment rate in Sanborn is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.9% in Cleburne.
Demographics
Demographics Sanborn vs Cleburne provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Sanborn | Cleburne |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 6 |
White | 94 | 52 |
Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
Hispanic | 1 | 29 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 11 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Sanborn vs Cleburne
- In Cleburne, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 1% in Sanborn.
- Sanborn has a higher percentage of White residents at 94% compared to 52% in Cleburne.
- In Cleburne, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Sanborn.
- Cleburne has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 29%, compared to 1% in Sanborn.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Cleburne at 11%, compared to 4% in Sanborn.
- In Cleburne, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Sanborn.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Sanborn | Cleburne |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.5% | 18.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.4% | 13.3% |
Depression | 24.9% | 23.6% |
Smoking | 17.7% | 20.0% |
Binge Drinking | 20.0% | 17.9% |
Obesity | 32.9% | 37.6% |
Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sanborn vs Cleburne
- In Cleburne, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 15.5% in Sanborn.
- Depression is more prevalent in Sanborn at 24.9% compared to 23.6% in Cleburne.
- Cleburne has a higher smoking rate at 20.0% compared to 17.7% in Sanborn.
- Binge drinking is more common in Sanborn at 20.0% compared to 17.9% in Cleburne.
- Cleburne has higher obesity rates at 37.6% compared to 32.9% in Sanborn.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Cleburne at 11.0% compared to 9.0% in Sanborn.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Sanborn | Cleburne |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 3.9% (58) | 1.4% (471) |
High School Diploma | 19.6% (294) | 17.8% (6,005) |
Less than High School | 16.0% (240) | 17.8% (6,010) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.9% (209) | 10.0% (3,384) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sanborn vs Cleburne
- A higher percentage of residents in Sanborn have no formal schooling at 3.9% compared to 1.4% in Cleburne.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sanborn hold a high school diploma at 19.6% compared to 17.8% in Cleburne.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Cleburne at 17.8%, compared to 16.0% in Sanborn.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sanborn hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.9% compared to 10.0% in Cleburne.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.