Demographics details for San jose, IL vs Coalinga, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in San jose, IL vs Coalinga, CA.
| Data | San jose | Coalinga |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 465 | 17,024 |
| Median Age | 40.3 years | 35.0 years |
| Median Income | $62,833 | $68,976 |
| Married Families | 66.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 6.5 |
Population Comparison: San jose vs Coalinga
- The population in Coalinga is higher at 17,024, compared to 465 in San jose.
- Residents in San jose have a higher median age of 40.3 years compared to 35.0 years in Coalinga.
- Coalinga has a higher median income of $68,976, compared to $62,833 in San jose.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in San jose at 66.0% compared to 31.0% in Coalinga.
- The poverty level is higher in Coalinga at 15%, compared to 8% in San jose.
- Coalinga has a higher unemployment rate at 6.5% compared to 3.5% in San jose.
Demographics
Demographics San jose vs Coalinga provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | San jose | Coalinga |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 4 |
| White | 82 | 9 |
| Asian | 5 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 65 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 18 |
| American Indian | 1 | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: San jose vs Coalinga
- In Coalinga, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 4% compared to 0% in San jose.
- San jose has a higher percentage of White residents at 82% compared to 9% in Coalinga.
- The Asian population is larger in San jose at 5% compared to 2% in Coalinga.
- Coalinga has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 65%, compared to 2% in San jose.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Coalinga at 18%, compared to 10% in San jose.
- In Coalinga, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 1% in San jose.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | San jose | Coalinga |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.8% | 16.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.3% | 13.9% |
| Depression | 21.6% | 16.4% |
| Smoking | 16.5% | 17.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.0% | 15.9% |
| Obesity | 36.1% | 39.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: San jose vs Coalinga
- In Coalinga, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.9% compared to 15.8% in San jose.
- Depression is more prevalent in San jose at 21.6% compared to 16.4% in Coalinga.
- Coalinga has a higher smoking rate at 17.2% compared to 16.5% in San jose.
- Binge drinking is more common in San jose at 19.0% compared to 15.9% in Coalinga.
- Coalinga has higher obesity rates at 39.1% compared to 36.1% in San jose.
- Disability percentages are higher in San jose at 20.0% compared to 13.0% in Coalinga.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | San jose | Coalinga |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.1% (5) | 3.2% (537) |
| High School Diploma | 40.0% (186) | 13.8% (2,349) |
| Less than High School | 15.1% (70) | 39.2% (6,672) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.7% (87) | 8.1% (1,380) |
Education Levels Comparison: San jose vs Coalinga
- In Coalinga, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.2% compared to 1.1% in San jose.
- A higher percentage of residents in San jose hold a high school diploma at 40.0% compared to 13.8% in Coalinga.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Coalinga at 39.2%, compared to 15.1% in San jose.
- A higher percentage of residents in San jose hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.7% compared to 8.1% in Coalinga.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.