Demographics details for San francisco, CA vs Port huron, MI

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in San francisco, CA vs Port huron, MI.

Data San francisco Port huron
Population 808,437 28,626
Median Age 39.3 years 39.0 years
Median Income $136,689 $47,906
Married Families 38.0% 30.0%
Poverty Level 12% 15%
Unemployment Rate 3.6 7.0

Population Comparison: San francisco vs Port huron

  • In San francisco, the population is higher at 808,437, compared to 28,626 in Port huron.
  • Residents in San francisco have a higher median age of 39.3 years compared to 39.0 years in Port huron.
  • San francisco has a higher median income of $136,689 compared to $47,906 in Port huron.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in San francisco at 38.0% compared to 30.0% in Port huron.
  • The poverty level is higher in Port huron at 15%, compared to 12% in San francisco.
  • Port huron has a higher unemployment rate at 7.0% compared to 3.6% in San francisco.

Demographics

Demographics San francisco vs Port huron provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic San francisco Port huron
Black 5 8
White 31 76
Asian 37 1
Hispanic 16 7
Two or More Races 10 8
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: San francisco vs Port huron

  • In Port huron, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 8% compared to 5% in San francisco.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Port huron at 76% compared to 31% in San francisco.
  • The Asian population is larger in San francisco at 37% compared to 1% in Port huron.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in San francisco at 16% compared to 7% in Port huron.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in San francisco at 10% compared to 8% in Port huron.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in San francisco at 1% compared to 0% in Port huron.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric San francisco Port huron
Mental Health Not Good 13.4% 20.8%
Physical Health Not Good 8.4% 15.0%
Depression 15.7% 28.2%
Smoking 9.2% 25.7%
Binge Drinking 16.4% 16.7%
Obesity 19.1% 40.5%
Disability Percentage 11.0% 22.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: San francisco vs Port huron

  • In Port huron, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.8% compared to 13.4% in San francisco.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Port huron at 28.2% versus 15.7% in San francisco.
  • Port huron has a higher smoking rate at 25.7% compared to 9.2% in San francisco.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Port huron at 16.7% compared to 16.4% in San francisco.
  • Port huron has higher obesity rates at 40.5% compared to 19.1% in San francisco.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Port huron at 22.0% compared to 11.0% in San francisco.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level San francisco Port huron
No Schooling 3.0% (23,928) 0.6% (172)
High School Diploma 8.5% (68,418) 19.5% (5,596)
Less than High School 12.4% (99,947) 13.5% (3,870)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 50.3% (406,774) 12.8% (3,662)

Education Levels Comparison: San francisco vs Port huron

  • A higher percentage of residents in San francisco have no formal schooling at 3.0% compared to 0.6% in Port huron.
  • In Port huron, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.5% compared to 8.5% in San francisco.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Port huron at 13.5%, compared to 12.4% in San francisco.
  • A higher percentage of residents in San francisco hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 50.3% compared to 12.8% in Port huron.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.