Demographics details for Safford, AZ vs Bothell, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Safford, AZ vs Bothell, WA.
| Data | Safford | Bothell |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 10,297 | 49,017 |
| Median Age | 31.6 years | 38.0 years |
| Median Income | $64,860 | $127,944 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 47.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 6% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.8 |
Population Comparison: Safford vs Bothell
- The population in Bothell is higher at 49,017, compared to 10,297 in Safford.
- The median age in Bothell is higher at 38.0 years, compared to 31.6 years in Safford.
- Bothell has a higher median income of $127,944, compared to $64,860 in Safford.
- In Bothell, the percentage of married families is higher at 47.0%, compared to 33.0% in Safford.
- The poverty level is higher in Bothell at 6%, compared to 0% in Safford.
- Bothell has a higher unemployment rate at 4.8% compared to 3.5% in Safford.
Demographics
Demographics Safford vs Bothell provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Safford | Bothell |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 1 |
| White | 31 | 63 |
| Asian | 1 | 18 |
| Hispanic | 50 | 9 |
| Two or More Races | 15 | 9 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Safford vs Bothell
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Safford at 2% compared to 1% in Bothell.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Bothell at 63% compared to 31% in Safford.
- In Bothell, the Asian population stands at 18%, greater than 1% in Safford.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Safford at 50% compared to 9% in Bothell.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Safford at 15% compared to 9% in Bothell.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Safford at 1% compared to 0% in Bothell.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Safford | Bothell |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.2% | 15.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.2% | 8.7% |
| Depression | 19.9% | 25.7% |
| Smoking | 16.6% | 8.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.0% | 17.5% |
| Obesity | 35.2% | 26.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Safford vs Bothell
- More residents in Safford report poor mental health at 17.2% compared to 15.0% in Bothell.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Bothell at 25.7% versus 19.9% in Safford.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Safford at 16.6% compared to 8.9% in Bothell.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Bothell at 17.5% compared to 17.0% in Safford.
- Obesity rates are higher in Safford at 35.2% compared to 26.2% in Bothell.
- Disability percentages are higher in Safford at 14.0% compared to 9.0% in Bothell.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Safford | Bothell |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.7% (274) | 0.6% (276) |
| High School Diploma | 11.1% (1,147) | 6.4% (3,131) |
| Less than High School | 17.7% (1,825) | 5.8% (2,838) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.6% (1,092) | 39.0% (19,107) |
Education Levels Comparison: Safford vs Bothell
- A higher percentage of residents in Safford have no formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 0.6% in Bothell.
- A higher percentage of residents in Safford hold a high school diploma at 11.1% compared to 6.4% in Bothell.
- More residents in Safford have less than a high school education at 17.7% compared to 5.8% in Bothell.
- In Bothell, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 39.0% compared to 10.6% in Safford.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.