Demographics details for Sac city, IA vs Paterson, NJ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sac city, IA vs Paterson, NJ.
| Data | Sac city | Paterson |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,023 | 156,661 |
| Median Age | 48.5 years | 33.1 years |
| Median Income | $54,815 | $52,092 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 27.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 18% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.2 | 8.8 |
Population Comparison: Sac city vs Paterson
- The population in Paterson is higher at 156,661, compared to 2,023 in Sac city.
- Residents in Sac city have a higher median age of 48.5 years compared to 33.1 years in Paterson.
- Sac city has a higher median income of $54,815 compared to $52,092 in Paterson.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Sac city at 39.0% compared to 27.0% in Paterson.
- The poverty level is higher in Paterson at 18%, compared to 8% in Sac city.
- Paterson has a higher unemployment rate at 8.8% compared to 2.2% in Sac city.
Demographics
Demographics Sac city vs Paterson provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Sac city | Paterson |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 25 |
| White | 95 | Data is updating |
| Asian | 1 | 5 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 64 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 17 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Sac city vs Paterson
- In Paterson, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 25% compared to 0% in Sac city.
- Sac city has a higher percentage of White residents at 95% compared to 0% in Paterson.
- In Paterson, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 1% in Sac city.
- Paterson has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 64%, compared to 2% in Sac city.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Paterson at 17%, compared to 2% in Sac city.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Sac city and Paterson at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Sac city | Paterson |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.9% | 17.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.0% | 15.1% |
| Depression | 19.0% | 16.5% |
| Smoking | 17.9% | 17.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 21.8% | 13.9% |
| Obesity | 38.7% | 38.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sac city vs Paterson
- In Paterson, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.5% compared to 15.9% in Sac city.
- Depression is more prevalent in Sac city at 19.0% compared to 16.5% in Paterson.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Sac city at 17.9% compared to 17.7% in Paterson.
- Binge drinking is more common in Sac city at 21.8% compared to 13.9% in Paterson.
- Obesity rates are higher in Sac city at 38.7% compared to 38.0% in Paterson.
- Disability percentages are higher in Sac city at 16.0% compared to 7.0% in Paterson.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Sac city | Paterson |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (7) | 2.1% (3,278) |
| High School Diploma | 20.1% (407) | 25.1% (39,354) |
| Less than High School | 11.3% (228) | 26.1% (40,961) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.7% (337) | 7.9% (12,450) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sac city vs Paterson
- In Paterson, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 0.3% in Sac city.
- In Paterson, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.1% compared to 20.1% in Sac city.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Paterson at 26.1%, compared to 11.3% in Sac city.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sac city hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.7% compared to 7.9% in Paterson.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.