Demographics details for S coffeyville, OK vs Gallatin, TN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in S coffeyville, OK vs Gallatin, TN.
| Data | S coffeyville | Gallatin |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 689 | 48,194 |
| Median Age | 37.8 years | 37.8 years |
| Median Income | $53,750 | $68,548 |
| Married Families | 44.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.3 |
Population Comparison: S coffeyville vs Gallatin
- The population in Gallatin is higher at 48,194, compared to 689 in S coffeyville.
- The median age is the same in both S coffeyville and Gallatin at 37.8 years.
- Gallatin has a higher median income of $68,548, compared to $53,750 in S coffeyville.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in S coffeyville at 44.0% compared to 37.0% in Gallatin.
- The poverty level is higher in Gallatin at 13%, compared to 0% in S coffeyville.
- The unemployment rate in S coffeyville is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.3% in Gallatin.
Demographics
Demographics S coffeyville vs Gallatin provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | S coffeyville | Gallatin |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 15 |
| White | 58 | 67 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | 4 | 9 |
| Two or More Races | 17 | 7 |
| American Indian | 18 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: S coffeyville vs Gallatin
- In Gallatin, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 15% compared to 3% in S coffeyville.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Gallatin at 67% compared to 58% in S coffeyville.
- In Gallatin, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in S coffeyville.
- Gallatin has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 9%, compared to 4% in S coffeyville.
- More residents identify as two or more races in S coffeyville at 17% compared to 7% in Gallatin.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in S coffeyville at 18% compared to 0% in Gallatin.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | S coffeyville | Gallatin |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.6% | 19.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.4% | 13.2% |
| Depression | 25.9% | 27.7% |
| Smoking | 20.2% | 20.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.3% | 14.7% |
| Obesity | 40.6% | 37.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: S coffeyville vs Gallatin
- In Gallatin, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 18.6% in S coffeyville.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Gallatin at 27.7% versus 25.9% in S coffeyville.
- Gallatin has a higher smoking rate at 20.8% compared to 20.2% in S coffeyville.
- Binge drinking is more common in S coffeyville at 15.3% compared to 14.7% in Gallatin.
- Obesity rates are higher in S coffeyville at 40.6% compared to 37.2% in Gallatin.
- Disability percentages are higher in S coffeyville at 15.0% compared to 11.0% in Gallatin.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | S coffeyville | Gallatin |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (3) | 1.2% (596) |
| High School Diploma | 25.4% (175) | 13.9% (6,695) |
| Less than High School | 17.6% (121) | 11.6% (5,600) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.4% (51) | 19.6% (9,464) |
Education Levels Comparison: S coffeyville vs Gallatin
- In Gallatin, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.4% in S coffeyville.
- A higher percentage of residents in S coffeyville hold a high school diploma at 25.4% compared to 13.9% in Gallatin.
- More residents in S coffeyville have less than a high school education at 17.6% compared to 11.6% in Gallatin.
- In Gallatin, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.6% compared to 7.4% in S coffeyville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.