Demographics details for Rutherford, NJ vs Grand junction, CO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Rutherford, NJ vs Grand junction, CO.
| Data | Rutherford | Grand junction |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 18,662 | 68,034 |
| Median Age | 40.5 years | 39.9 years |
| Median Income | $128,576 | $62,993 |
| Married Families | 42.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.4 | 4.7 |
Population Comparison: Rutherford vs Grand junction
- The population in Grand junction is higher at 68,034, compared to 18,662 in Rutherford.
- Residents in Rutherford have a higher median age of 40.5 years compared to 39.9 years in Grand junction.
- Rutherford has a higher median income of $128,576 compared to $62,993 in Grand junction.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Rutherford at 42.0% compared to 35.0% in Grand junction.
- The poverty level is higher in Grand junction at 10%, compared to 9% in Rutherford.
- Grand junction has a higher unemployment rate at 4.7% compared to 3.4% in Rutherford.
Demographics
Demographics Rutherford vs Grand junction provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Rutherford | Grand junction |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 1 |
| White | 49 | 73 |
| Asian | 16 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 21 | 16 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Rutherford vs Grand junction
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Rutherford at 3% compared to 1% in Grand junction.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Grand junction at 73% compared to 49% in Rutherford.
- The Asian population is larger in Rutherford at 16% compared to 1% in Grand junction.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Rutherford at 21% compared to 16% in Grand junction.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Rutherford at 11% compared to 8% in Grand junction.
- In Grand junction, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Rutherford.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Rutherford | Grand junction |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.2% | 17.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.8% | 11.8% |
| Depression | 17.0% | 24.5% |
| Smoking | 10.8% | 17.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 19.2% |
| Obesity | 24.9% | 29.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Rutherford vs Grand junction
- In Grand junction, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 13.2% in Rutherford.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Grand junction at 24.5% versus 17.0% in Rutherford.
- Grand junction has a higher smoking rate at 17.3% compared to 10.8% in Rutherford.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Grand junction at 19.2% compared to 17.6% in Rutherford.
- Grand junction has higher obesity rates at 29.2% compared to 24.9% in Rutherford.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Grand junction at 15.0% compared to 9.0% in Rutherford.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Rutherford | Grand junction |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (161) | 0.4% (245) |
| High School Diploma | 12.4% (2,318) | 13.9% (9,476) |
| Less than High School | 6.3% (1,175) | 9.7% (6,605) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 38.9% (7,259) | 23.8% (16,201) |
Education Levels Comparison: Rutherford vs Grand junction
- A higher percentage of residents in Rutherford have no formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.4% in Grand junction.
- In Grand junction, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.9% compared to 12.4% in Rutherford.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Grand junction at 9.7%, compared to 6.3% in Rutherford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Rutherford hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.9% compared to 23.8% in Grand junction.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.