Demographics details for Rutherford, NJ vs Ashland, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Rutherford, NJ vs Ashland, OH.
| Data | Rutherford | Ashland |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 18,662 | 19,015 |
| Median Age | 40.5 years | 38.8 years |
| Median Income | $128,576 | $56,040 |
| Married Families | 42.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.4 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Rutherford vs Ashland
- The population in Ashland is higher at 19,015, compared to 18,662 in Rutherford.
- Residents in Rutherford have a higher median age of 40.5 years compared to 38.8 years in Ashland.
- Rutherford has a higher median income of $128,576 compared to $56,040 in Ashland.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Rutherford at 42.0% compared to 38.0% in Ashland.
- The poverty level is higher in Ashland at 11%, compared to 9% in Rutherford.
- Ashland has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.4% in Rutherford.
Demographics
Demographics Rutherford vs Ashland provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Rutherford | Ashland |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 2 |
| White | 49 | 91 |
| Asian | 16 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 21 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Rutherford vs Ashland
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Rutherford at 3% compared to 2% in Ashland.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Ashland at 91% compared to 49% in Rutherford.
- The Asian population is larger in Rutherford at 16% compared to 1% in Ashland.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Rutherford at 21% compared to 2% in Ashland.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Rutherford at 11% compared to 4% in Ashland.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Rutherford and Ashland at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Rutherford | Ashland |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.2% | 18.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.8% | 12.1% |
| Depression | 17.0% | 24.6% |
| Smoking | 10.8% | 20.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 18.1% |
| Obesity | 24.9% | 38.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Rutherford vs Ashland
- In Ashland, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.2% compared to 13.2% in Rutherford.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Ashland at 24.6% versus 17.0% in Rutherford.
- Ashland has a higher smoking rate at 20.6% compared to 10.8% in Rutherford.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Ashland at 18.1% compared to 17.6% in Rutherford.
- Ashland has higher obesity rates at 38.7% compared to 24.9% in Rutherford.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Ashland at 16.0% compared to 9.0% in Rutherford.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Rutherford | Ashland |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (161) | 0.1% (28) |
| High School Diploma | 12.4% (2,318) | 23.0% (4,380) |
| Less than High School | 6.3% (1,175) | 12.3% (2,337) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 38.9% (7,259) | 16.6% (3,160) |
Education Levels Comparison: Rutherford vs Ashland
- A higher percentage of residents in Rutherford have no formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.1% in Ashland.
- In Ashland, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.0% compared to 12.4% in Rutherford.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Ashland at 12.3%, compared to 6.3% in Rutherford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Rutherford hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.9% compared to 16.6% in Ashland.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.