Demographics details for Russell springs, KY vs Baldwin park, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Russell springs, KY vs Baldwin park, CA.

Data Russell springs Baldwin park
Population 2,750 69,455
Median Age 44.8 years 37.1 years
Median Income $34,219 $76,002
Married Families 29.0% 37.0%
Poverty Level 15% 12%
Unemployment Rate 4.5 6.3

Population Comparison: Russell springs vs Baldwin park

  • The population in Baldwin park is higher at 69,455, compared to 2,750 in Russell springs.
  • Residents in Russell springs have a higher median age of 44.8 years compared to 37.1 years in Baldwin park.
  • Baldwin park has a higher median income of $76,002, compared to $34,219 in Russell springs.
  • In Baldwin park, the percentage of married families is higher at 37.0%, compared to 29.0% in Russell springs.
  • Russell springs has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 12% in Baldwin park.
  • Baldwin park has a higher unemployment rate at 6.3% compared to 4.5% in Russell springs.

Demographics

Demographics Russell springs vs Baldwin park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Russell springs Baldwin park
Black 1 1
White 88 -25
Asian Data is updating 23
Hispanic 3 75
Two or More Races 8 23
American Indian Data is updating 3

Demographics Comparison: Russell springs vs Baldwin park

  • The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Russell springs and Baldwin park at 1%.
  • Russell springs has a higher percentage of White residents at 88% compared to -25% in Baldwin park.
  • In Baldwin park, the Asian population stands at 23%, greater than 0% in Russell springs.
  • Baldwin park has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 75%, compared to 3% in Russell springs.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Baldwin park at 23%, compared to 8% in Russell springs.
  • In Baldwin park, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 0% in Russell springs.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Russell springs Baldwin park
Mental Health Not Good 20.7% 15.4%
Physical Health Not Good 15.6% 12.7%
Depression 29.0% 14.7%
Smoking 25.6% 11.4%
Binge Drinking 14.5% 14.2%
Obesity 40.3% 29.9%
Disability Percentage 15.0% 10.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Russell springs vs Baldwin park

  • More residents in Russell springs report poor mental health at 20.7% compared to 15.4% in Baldwin park.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Russell springs at 29.0% compared to 14.7% in Baldwin park.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Russell springs at 25.6% compared to 11.4% in Baldwin park.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Russell springs at 14.5% compared to 14.2% in Baldwin park.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Russell springs at 40.3% compared to 29.9% in Baldwin park.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Russell springs at 15.0% compared to 10.0% in Baldwin park.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Russell springs Baldwin park
No Schooling 0.7% (20) 5.5% (3,853)
High School Diploma 13.6% (375) 18.1% (12,587)
Less than High School 23.3% (642) 41.7% (28,939)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 18.4% (505) 9.8% (6,787)

Education Levels Comparison: Russell springs vs Baldwin park

  • In Baldwin park, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 5.5% compared to 0.7% in Russell springs.
  • In Baldwin park, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.1% compared to 13.6% in Russell springs.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Baldwin park at 41.7%, compared to 23.3% in Russell springs.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Russell springs hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.4% compared to 9.8% in Baldwin park.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.