Demographics details for Russell springs, KY vs Aberdeen, SD

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Russell springs, KY vs Aberdeen, SD.

Data Russell springs Aberdeen
Population 2,750 28,210
Median Age 44.8 years 35.6 years
Median Income $34,219 $62,684
Married Families 29.0% 36.0%
Poverty Level 15% 10%
Unemployment Rate 4.5 2.2

Population Comparison: Russell springs vs Aberdeen

  • The population in Aberdeen is higher at 28,210, compared to 2,750 in Russell springs.
  • Residents in Russell springs have a higher median age of 44.8 years compared to 35.6 years in Aberdeen.
  • Aberdeen has a higher median income of $62,684, compared to $34,219 in Russell springs.
  • In Aberdeen, the percentage of married families is higher at 36.0%, compared to 29.0% in Russell springs.
  • Russell springs has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 10% in Aberdeen.
  • The unemployment rate in Russell springs is higher at 4.5%, compared to 2.2% in Aberdeen.

Demographics

Demographics Russell springs vs Aberdeen provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Russell springs Aberdeen
Black 1 3
White 88 79
Asian Data is updating 5
Hispanic 3 5
Two or More Races 8 4
American Indian Data is updating 4

Demographics Comparison: Russell springs vs Aberdeen

  • In Aberdeen, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 1% in Russell springs.
  • Russell springs has a higher percentage of White residents at 88% compared to 79% in Aberdeen.
  • In Aberdeen, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 0% in Russell springs.
  • Aberdeen has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 3% in Russell springs.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Russell springs at 8% compared to 4% in Aberdeen.
  • In Aberdeen, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 4%, compared to 0% in Russell springs.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Russell springs Aberdeen
Mental Health Not Good 20.7% 13.0%
Physical Health Not Good 15.6% 9.4%
Depression 29.0% 17.5%
Smoking 25.6% 16.2%
Binge Drinking 14.5% 20.2%
Obesity 40.3% 37.3%
Disability Percentage 15.0% 13.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Russell springs vs Aberdeen

  • More residents in Russell springs report poor mental health at 20.7% compared to 13.0% in Aberdeen.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Russell springs at 29.0% compared to 17.5% in Aberdeen.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Russell springs at 25.6% compared to 16.2% in Aberdeen.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Aberdeen at 20.2% compared to 14.5% in Russell springs.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Russell springs at 40.3% compared to 37.3% in Aberdeen.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Russell springs at 15.0% compared to 13.0% in Aberdeen.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Russell springs Aberdeen
No Schooling 0.7% (20) 0.4% (121)
High School Diploma 13.6% (375) 18.2% (5,127)
Less than High School 23.3% (642) 8.0% (2,266)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 18.4% (505) 22.0% (6,206)

Education Levels Comparison: Russell springs vs Aberdeen

  • A higher percentage of residents in Russell springs have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.4% in Aberdeen.
  • In Aberdeen, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.2% compared to 13.6% in Russell springs.
  • More residents in Russell springs have less than a high school education at 23.3% compared to 8.0% in Aberdeen.
  • In Aberdeen, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.0% compared to 18.4% in Russell springs.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.