Demographics details for Rosendale, WI vs Sterling heights, MI

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Rosendale, WI vs Sterling heights, MI.

Data Rosendale Sterling heights
Population 1,035 132,567
Median Age 43.6 years 41.2 years
Median Income $86,364 $75,381
Married Families 50.0% 45.0%
Poverty Level 6% 8%
Unemployment Rate 3.2 4.7

Population Comparison: Rosendale vs Sterling heights

  • The population in Sterling heights is higher at 132,567, compared to 1,035 in Rosendale.
  • Residents in Rosendale have a higher median age of 43.6 years compared to 41.2 years in Sterling heights.
  • Rosendale has a higher median income of $86,364 compared to $75,381 in Sterling heights.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Rosendale at 50.0% compared to 45.0% in Sterling heights.
  • The poverty level is higher in Sterling heights at 8%, compared to 6% in Rosendale.
  • Sterling heights has a higher unemployment rate at 4.7% compared to 3.2% in Rosendale.

Demographics

Demographics Rosendale vs Sterling heights provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Rosendale Sterling heights
Black 1 6
White 92 79
Asian Data is updating 9
Hispanic 3 2
Two or More Races 4 4
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Rosendale vs Sterling heights

  • In Sterling heights, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 1% in Rosendale.
  • Rosendale has a higher percentage of White residents at 92% compared to 79% in Sterling heights.
  • In Sterling heights, the Asian population stands at 9%, greater than 0% in Rosendale.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Rosendale at 3% compared to 2% in Sterling heights.
  • Both Rosendale and Sterling heights have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 4%.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Rosendale and Sterling heights at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Rosendale Sterling heights
Mental Health Not Good 14.6% 17.8%
Physical Health Not Good 9.4% 11.4%
Depression 23.1% 25.5%
Smoking 14.8% 19.8%
Binge Drinking 24.6% 17.7%
Obesity 39.0% 36.6%
Disability Percentage 11.0% 13.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Rosendale vs Sterling heights

  • In Sterling heights, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 14.6% in Rosendale.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Sterling heights at 25.5% versus 23.1% in Rosendale.
  • Sterling heights has a higher smoking rate at 19.8% compared to 14.8% in Rosendale.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Rosendale at 24.6% compared to 17.7% in Sterling heights.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Rosendale at 39.0% compared to 36.6% in Sterling heights.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Sterling heights at 13.0% compared to 11.0% in Rosendale.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Rosendale Sterling heights
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 2.4% (3,134)
High School Diploma 24.6% (255) 18.8% (24,937)
Less than High School 7.3% (76) 16.6% (22,008)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 16.0% (166) 22.3% (29,518)

Education Levels Comparison: Rosendale vs Sterling heights

  • In Sterling heights, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.4% compared to 0.0% in Rosendale.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Rosendale hold a high school diploma at 24.6% compared to 18.8% in Sterling heights.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Sterling heights at 16.6%, compared to 7.3% in Rosendale.
  • In Sterling heights, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.3% compared to 16.0% in Rosendale.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.