Demographics details for Rosamond, CA vs De queen, AR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Rosamond, CA vs De queen, AR.
Data | Rosamond | De queen |
---|---|---|
Population | 20,654 | 6,042 |
Median Age | 30.9 years | 33.0 years |
Median Income | $77,318 | $55,207 |
Married Families | 37.0% | 35.0% |
Poverty Level | 13% | 24% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.8 |
Population Comparison: Rosamond vs De queen
- In Rosamond, the population is higher at 20,654, compared to 6,042 in De queen.
- The median age in De queen is higher at 33.0 years, compared to 30.9 years in Rosamond.
- Rosamond has a higher median income of $77,318 compared to $55,207 in De queen.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Rosamond at 37.0% compared to 35.0% in De queen.
- The poverty level is higher in De queen at 24%, compared to 13% in Rosamond.
- De queen has a higher unemployment rate at 4.8% compared to 4.5% in Rosamond.
Demographics
Demographics Rosamond vs De queen provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Rosamond | De queen |
---|---|---|
Black | 11 | 6 |
White | 29 | 28 |
Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 46 | 60 |
Two or More Races | 12 | 5 |
American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Rosamond vs De queen
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Rosamond at 11% compared to 6% in De queen.
- Rosamond has a higher percentage of White residents at 29% compared to 28% in De queen.
- The Asian population is larger in Rosamond at 1% compared to 0% in De queen.
- De queen has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 60%, compared to 46% in Rosamond.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Rosamond at 12% compared to 5% in De queen.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Rosamond and De queen at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Rosamond | De queen |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.1% | 20.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.3% | 17.2% |
Depression | 20.5% | 24.7% |
Smoking | 16.8% | 24.0% |
Binge Drinking | 16.5% | 12.9% |
Obesity | 35.1% | 44.1% |
Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Rosamond vs De queen
- In De queen, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.2% compared to 18.1% in Rosamond.
- Higher depression rates are seen in De queen at 24.7% versus 20.5% in Rosamond.
- De queen has a higher smoking rate at 24.0% compared to 16.8% in Rosamond.
- Binge drinking is more common in Rosamond at 16.5% compared to 12.9% in De queen.
- De queen has higher obesity rates at 44.1% compared to 35.1% in Rosamond.
- Disability percentages are higher in Rosamond at 15.0% compared to 12.0% in De queen.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Rosamond | De queen |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.8% (380) | 1.8% (108) |
High School Diploma | 17.2% (3,548) | 15.0% (905) |
Less than High School | 20.0% (4,130) | 46.5% (2,809) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.4% (2,355) | 7.0% (421) |
Education Levels Comparison: Rosamond vs De queen
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Rosamond and De queen at 1.8%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Rosamond hold a high school diploma at 17.2% compared to 15.0% in De queen.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in De queen at 46.5%, compared to 20.0% in Rosamond.
- A higher percentage of residents in Rosamond hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.4% compared to 7.0% in De queen.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.