Demographics details for Rogers, MN vs Sterling heights, MI

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Rogers, MN vs Sterling heights, MI.

Data Rogers Sterling heights
Population 13,500 132,567
Median Age 37.2 years 41.2 years
Median Income $154,611 $75,381
Married Families 48.0% 45.0%
Poverty Level 5% 8%
Unemployment Rate 3.2 4.7

Population Comparison: Rogers vs Sterling heights

  • The population in Sterling heights is higher at 132,567, compared to 13,500 in Rogers.
  • The median age in Sterling heights is higher at 41.2 years, compared to 37.2 years in Rogers.
  • Rogers has a higher median income of $154,611 compared to $75,381 in Sterling heights.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Rogers at 48.0% compared to 45.0% in Sterling heights.
  • The poverty level is higher in Sterling heights at 8%, compared to 5% in Rogers.
  • Sterling heights has a higher unemployment rate at 4.7% compared to 3.2% in Rogers.

Demographics

Demographics Rogers vs Sterling heights provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Rogers Sterling heights
Black 1 6
White 94 79
Asian 1 9
Hispanic 1 2
Two or More Races 3 4
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Rogers vs Sterling heights

  • In Sterling heights, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 1% in Rogers.
  • Rogers has a higher percentage of White residents at 94% compared to 79% in Sterling heights.
  • In Sterling heights, the Asian population stands at 9%, greater than 1% in Rogers.
  • Sterling heights has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 2%, compared to 1% in Rogers.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Sterling heights at 4%, compared to 3% in Rogers.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Rogers and Sterling heights at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Rogers Sterling heights
Mental Health Not Good 13.2% 17.8%
Physical Health Not Good 6.8% 11.4%
Depression 23.7% 25.5%
Smoking 11.3% 19.8%
Binge Drinking 22.7% 17.7%
Obesity 25.5% 36.6%
Disability Percentage 11.0% 13.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Rogers vs Sterling heights

  • In Sterling heights, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 13.2% in Rogers.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Sterling heights at 25.5% versus 23.7% in Rogers.
  • Sterling heights has a higher smoking rate at 19.8% compared to 11.3% in Rogers.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Rogers at 22.7% compared to 17.7% in Sterling heights.
  • Sterling heights has higher obesity rates at 36.6% compared to 25.5% in Rogers.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Sterling heights at 13.0% compared to 11.0% in Rogers.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Rogers Sterling heights
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 2.4% (3,134)
High School Diploma 10.5% (1,424) 18.8% (24,937)
Less than High School 3.3% (449) 16.6% (22,008)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 32.2% (4,344) 22.3% (29,518)

Education Levels Comparison: Rogers vs Sterling heights

  • In Sterling heights, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.4% compared to 0.0% in Rogers.
  • In Sterling heights, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.8% compared to 10.5% in Rogers.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Sterling heights at 16.6%, compared to 3.3% in Rogers.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Rogers hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 32.2% compared to 22.3% in Sterling heights.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.