Demographics details for Rockford, IL vs San jose, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Rockford, IL vs San jose, CA.
Data | Rockford | San jose |
---|---|---|
Population | 146,713 | 971,233 |
Median Age | 37.5 years | 37.8 years |
Median Income | $50,744 | $136,010 |
Married Families | 32.0% | 42.0% |
Poverty Level | 20% | 11% |
Unemployment Rate | 7.6 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Rockford vs San jose
- The population in San jose is higher at 971,233, compared to 146,713 in Rockford.
- The median age in San jose is higher at 37.8 years, compared to 37.5 years in Rockford.
- San jose has a higher median income of $136,010, compared to $50,744 in Rockford.
- In San jose, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 32.0% in Rockford.
- Rockford has a higher poverty level at 20% compared to 11% in San jose.
- The unemployment rate in Rockford is higher at 7.6%, compared to 4.2% in San jose.
Demographics
Demographics Rockford vs San jose provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Rockford | San jose |
---|---|---|
Black | 22 | 3 |
White | 46 | 12 |
Asian | 4 | 39 |
Hispanic | 19 | 32 |
Two or More Races | 9 | 13 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Rockford vs San jose
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Rockford at 22% compared to 3% in San jose.
- Rockford has a higher percentage of White residents at 46% compared to 12% in San jose.
- In San jose, the Asian population stands at 39%, greater than 4% in Rockford.
- San jose has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 32%, compared to 19% in Rockford.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in San jose at 13%, compared to 9% in Rockford.
- In San jose, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Rockford.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Rockford | San jose |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.0% | 13.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.9% | 8.7% |
Depression | 21.0% | 14.7% |
Smoking | 21.2% | 8.7% |
Binge Drinking | 14.8% | 13.8% |
Obesity | 44.3% | 20.6% |
Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Rockford vs San jose
- More residents in Rockford report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 13.1% in San jose.
- Depression is more prevalent in Rockford at 21.0% compared to 14.7% in San jose.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Rockford at 21.2% compared to 8.7% in San jose.
- Binge drinking is more common in Rockford at 14.8% compared to 13.8% in San jose.
- Obesity rates are higher in Rockford at 44.3% compared to 20.6% in San jose.
- Disability percentages are higher in Rockford at 16.0% compared to 9.0% in San jose.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Rockford | San jose |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.2% (1,781) | 2.7% (26,673) |
High School Diploma | 16.4% (24,126) | 10.3% (100,469) |
Less than High School | 17.1% (25,088) | 17.0% (165,241) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.5% (22,792) | 33.0% (320,589) |
Education Levels Comparison: Rockford vs San jose
- In San jose, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 1.2% in Rockford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Rockford hold a high school diploma at 16.4% compared to 10.3% in San jose.
- More residents in Rockford have less than a high school education at 17.1% compared to 17.0% in San jose.
- In San jose, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 33.0% compared to 15.5% in Rockford.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.