Demographics details for Riverside, CA vs Fort valley, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Riverside, CA vs Fort valley, GA.
Data | Riverside | Fort valley |
---|---|---|
Population | 320,764 | 8,838 |
Median Age | 32.4 years | 30.6 years |
Median Income | $83,448 | $31,807 |
Married Families | 33.0% | 18.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 25% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.9 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Riverside vs Fort valley
- In Riverside, the population is higher at 320,764, compared to 8,838 in Fort valley.
- Residents in Riverside have a higher median age of 32.4 years compared to 30.6 years in Fort valley.
- Riverside has a higher median income of $83,448 compared to $31,807 in Fort valley.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Riverside at 33.0% compared to 18.0% in Fort valley.
- The poverty level is higher in Fort valley at 25%, compared to 12% in Riverside.
- The unemployment rate in Riverside is higher at 4.9%, compared to 4.5% in Fort valley.
Demographics
Demographics Riverside vs Fort valley provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Riverside | Fort valley |
---|---|---|
Black | 6 | 70 |
White | 18 | 18 |
Asian | 8 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 55 | 8 |
Two or More Races | 12 | 4 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Riverside vs Fort valley
- In Fort valley, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 70% compared to 6% in Riverside.
- The percentage of White residents is the same in both Riverside and Fort valley at 18%.
- The Asian population is larger in Riverside at 8% compared to 0% in Fort valley.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Riverside at 55% compared to 8% in Fort valley.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Riverside at 12% compared to 4% in Fort valley.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Riverside at 1% compared to 0% in Fort valley.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Riverside | Fort valley |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.0% | 19.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.7% | 15.5% |
Depression | 17.1% | 19.5% |
Smoking | 13.2% | 22.3% |
Binge Drinking | 16.1% | 11.8% |
Obesity | 36.2% | 46.2% |
Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Riverside vs Fort valley
- In Fort valley, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 16.0% in Riverside.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Fort valley at 19.5% versus 17.1% in Riverside.
- Fort valley has a higher smoking rate at 22.3% compared to 13.2% in Riverside.
- Binge drinking is more common in Riverside at 16.1% compared to 11.8% in Fort valley.
- Fort valley has higher obesity rates at 46.2% compared to 36.2% in Riverside.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fort valley at 16.0% compared to 10.0% in Riverside.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Riverside | Fort valley |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.0% (6,286) | 3.0% (267) |
High School Diploma | 15.7% (50,271) | 13.9% (1,226) |
Less than High School | 20.3% (64,976) | 17.3% (1,527) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.9% (47,929) | 10.8% (954) |
Education Levels Comparison: Riverside vs Fort valley
- In Fort valley, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.0% compared to 2.0% in Riverside.
- A higher percentage of residents in Riverside hold a high school diploma at 15.7% compared to 13.9% in Fort valley.
- More residents in Riverside have less than a high school education at 20.3% compared to 17.3% in Fort valley.
- A higher percentage of residents in Riverside hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.9% compared to 10.8% in Fort valley.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.