Demographics details for Riverside, AL vs Gallatin, TN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Riverside, AL vs Gallatin, TN.
| Data | Riverside | Gallatin |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,234 | 48,194 |
| Median Age | 42.0 years | 37.8 years |
| Median Income | $70,208 | $68,548 |
| Married Families | 41.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 7% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.3 |
Population Comparison: Riverside vs Gallatin
- The population in Gallatin is higher at 48,194, compared to 2,234 in Riverside.
- Residents in Riverside have a higher median age of 42.0 years compared to 37.8 years in Gallatin.
- Riverside has a higher median income of $70,208 compared to $68,548 in Gallatin.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Riverside at 41.0% compared to 37.0% in Gallatin.
- The poverty level is higher in Gallatin at 13%, compared to 7% in Riverside.
- The unemployment rate in Riverside is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.3% in Gallatin.
Demographics
Demographics Riverside vs Gallatin provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Riverside | Gallatin |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 15 | 15 |
| White | 80 | 67 |
| Asian | 2 | 2 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 9 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Riverside vs Gallatin
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Riverside and Gallatin at 15%.
- Riverside has a higher percentage of White residents at 80% compared to 67% in Gallatin.
- Both Riverside and Gallatin have the same percentage of Asian residents at 2%.
- Gallatin has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 9%, compared to 0% in Riverside.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Gallatin at 7%, compared to 3% in Riverside.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Riverside and Gallatin at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Riverside | Gallatin |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.5% | 19.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.2% | 13.2% |
| Depression | 25.6% | 27.7% |
| Smoking | 22.4% | 20.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.5% | 14.7% |
| Obesity | 41.4% | 37.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 23.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Riverside vs Gallatin
- More residents in Riverside report poor mental health at 20.5% compared to 19.0% in Gallatin.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Gallatin at 27.7% versus 25.6% in Riverside.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Riverside at 22.4% compared to 20.8% in Gallatin.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Gallatin at 14.7% compared to 14.5% in Riverside.
- Obesity rates are higher in Riverside at 41.4% compared to 37.2% in Gallatin.
- Disability percentages are higher in Riverside at 23.0% compared to 11.0% in Gallatin.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Riverside | Gallatin |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (27) | 1.2% (596) |
| High School Diploma | 26.1% (583) | 13.9% (6,695) |
| Less than High School | 25.7% (574) | 11.6% (5,600) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.7% (329) | 19.6% (9,464) |
Education Levels Comparison: Riverside vs Gallatin
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Riverside and Gallatin at 1.2%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Riverside hold a high school diploma at 26.1% compared to 13.9% in Gallatin.
- More residents in Riverside have less than a high school education at 25.7% compared to 11.6% in Gallatin.
- In Gallatin, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.6% compared to 14.7% in Riverside.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.