Demographics details for Riverbank, CA vs Sterling heights, MI

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Riverbank, CA vs Sterling heights, MI.

Data Riverbank Sterling heights
Population 24,826 132,567
Median Age 33.6 years 41.2 years
Median Income $89,504 $75,381
Married Families 38.0% 45.0%
Poverty Level 10% 8%
Unemployment Rate 5.2 4.7

Population Comparison: Riverbank vs Sterling heights

  • The population in Sterling heights is higher at 132,567, compared to 24,826 in Riverbank.
  • The median age in Sterling heights is higher at 41.2 years, compared to 33.6 years in Riverbank.
  • Riverbank has a higher median income of $89,504 compared to $75,381 in Sterling heights.
  • In Sterling heights, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 38.0% in Riverbank.
  • Riverbank has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 8% in Sterling heights.
  • The unemployment rate in Riverbank is higher at 5.2%, compared to 4.7% in Sterling heights.

Demographics

Demographics Riverbank vs Sterling heights provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Riverbank Sterling heights
Black 1 6
White 13 79
Asian 6 9
Hispanic 55 2
Two or More Races 23 4
American Indian 2 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Riverbank vs Sterling heights

  • In Sterling heights, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 1% in Riverbank.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Sterling heights at 79% compared to 13% in Riverbank.
  • In Sterling heights, the Asian population stands at 9%, greater than 6% in Riverbank.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Riverbank at 55% compared to 2% in Sterling heights.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Riverbank at 23% compared to 4% in Sterling heights.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Riverbank at 2% compared to 0% in Sterling heights.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Riverbank Sterling heights
Mental Health Not Good 17.2% 17.8%
Physical Health Not Good 13.2% 11.4%
Depression 21.0% 25.5%
Smoking 15.0% 19.8%
Binge Drinking 16.4% 17.7%
Obesity 35.0% 36.6%
Disability Percentage 10.0% 13.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Riverbank vs Sterling heights

  • In Sterling heights, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 17.2% in Riverbank.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Sterling heights at 25.5% versus 21.0% in Riverbank.
  • Sterling heights has a higher smoking rate at 19.8% compared to 15.0% in Riverbank.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Sterling heights at 17.7% compared to 16.4% in Riverbank.
  • Sterling heights has higher obesity rates at 36.6% compared to 35.0% in Riverbank.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Sterling heights at 13.0% compared to 10.0% in Riverbank.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Riverbank Sterling heights
No Schooling 3.1% (766) 2.4% (3,134)
High School Diploma 15.2% (3,764) 18.8% (24,937)
Less than High School 22.2% (5,505) 16.6% (22,008)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 11.3% (2,804) 22.3% (29,518)

Education Levels Comparison: Riverbank vs Sterling heights

  • A higher percentage of residents in Riverbank have no formal schooling at 3.1% compared to 2.4% in Sterling heights.
  • In Sterling heights, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.8% compared to 15.2% in Riverbank.
  • More residents in Riverbank have less than a high school education at 22.2% compared to 16.6% in Sterling heights.
  • In Sterling heights, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.3% compared to 11.3% in Riverbank.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.