Demographics details for Richwood, WV vs Sterling, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Richwood, WV vs Sterling, IL.
| Data | Richwood | Sterling |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,640 | 14,566 |
| Median Age | 44.7 years | 43.0 years |
| Median Income | $30,962 | $49,007 |
| Married Families | 49.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.6 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Richwood vs Sterling
- The population in Sterling is higher at 14,566, compared to 1,640 in Richwood.
- Residents in Richwood have a higher median age of 44.7 years compared to 43.0 years in Sterling.
- Sterling has a higher median income of $49,007, compared to $30,962 in Richwood.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Richwood at 49.0% compared to 32.0% in Sterling.
- The poverty level is higher in Sterling at 12%, compared to 0% in Richwood.
- Sterling has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.6% in Richwood.
Demographics
Demographics Richwood vs Sterling provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Richwood | Sterling |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 2 |
| White | 99 | 56 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 27 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 12 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Richwood vs Sterling
- In Sterling, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 0% in Richwood.
- Richwood has a higher percentage of White residents at 99% compared to 56% in Sterling.
- In Sterling, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Richwood.
- Sterling has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 27%, compared to 0% in Richwood.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Sterling at 12%, compared to 1% in Richwood.
- In Sterling, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Richwood.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Richwood | Sterling |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 22.9% | 16.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 16.3% | 12.2% |
| Depression | 30.5% | 22.2% |
| Smoking | 25.7% | 18.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 12.8% | 17.4% |
| Obesity | 46.3% | 39.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 46.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Richwood vs Sterling
- More residents in Richwood report poor mental health at 22.9% compared to 16.7% in Sterling.
- Depression is more prevalent in Richwood at 30.5% compared to 22.2% in Sterling.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Richwood at 25.7% compared to 18.6% in Sterling.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Sterling at 17.4% compared to 12.8% in Richwood.
- Obesity rates are higher in Richwood at 46.3% compared to 39.5% in Sterling.
- Disability percentages are higher in Richwood at 46.0% compared to 17.0% in Sterling.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Richwood | Sterling |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.6% (27) | 1.1% (164) |
| High School Diploma | 47.0% (771) | 24.1% (3,511) |
| Less than High School | 28.7% (470) | 13.8% (2,012) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.7% (257) | 11.8% (1,713) |
Education Levels Comparison: Richwood vs Sterling
- A higher percentage of residents in Richwood have no formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 1.1% in Sterling.
- A higher percentage of residents in Richwood hold a high school diploma at 47.0% compared to 24.1% in Sterling.
- More residents in Richwood have less than a high school education at 28.7% compared to 13.8% in Sterling.
- A higher percentage of residents in Richwood hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.7% compared to 11.8% in Sterling.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.