Demographics details for Richmond, UT vs Sanford, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Richmond, UT vs Sanford, NC.
| Data | Richmond | Sanford |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,986 | 31,224 |
| Median Age | 35.2 years | 34.6 years |
| Median Income | $84,511 | $52,951 |
| Married Families | 48.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 7% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 4.8 |
Population Comparison: Richmond vs Sanford
- The population in Sanford is higher at 31,224, compared to 2,986 in Richmond.
- Residents in Richmond have a higher median age of 35.2 years compared to 34.6 years in Sanford.
- Richmond has a higher median income of $84,511 compared to $52,951 in Sanford.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Richmond at 48.0% compared to 32.0% in Sanford.
- The poverty level is higher in Sanford at 13%, compared to 7% in Richmond.
- Sanford has a higher unemployment rate at 4.8% compared to 2.5% in Richmond.
Demographics
Demographics Richmond vs Sanford provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Richmond | Sanford |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 25 |
| White | 87 | 34 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | 7 | 29 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 10 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Richmond vs Sanford
- In Sanford, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 25% compared to 0% in Richmond.
- Richmond has a higher percentage of White residents at 87% compared to 34% in Sanford.
- In Sanford, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Richmond.
- Sanford has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 29%, compared to 7% in Richmond.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Sanford at 10%, compared to 6% in Richmond.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Richmond and Sanford at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Richmond | Sanford |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.8% | 17.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.4% | 13.2% |
| Depression | 25.0% | 23.2% |
| Smoking | 9.9% | 18.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 11.3% | 15.3% |
| Obesity | 31.7% | 41.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Richmond vs Sanford
- In Sanford, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.4% compared to 16.8% in Richmond.
- Depression is more prevalent in Richmond at 25.0% compared to 23.2% in Sanford.
- Sanford has a higher smoking rate at 18.8% compared to 9.9% in Richmond.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Sanford at 15.3% compared to 11.3% in Richmond.
- Sanford has higher obesity rates at 41.1% compared to 31.7% in Richmond.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Sanford at 14.0% compared to 9.0% in Richmond.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Richmond | Sanford |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.4% (443) |
| High School Diploma | 13.0% (387) | 12.5% (3,909) |
| Less than High School | 2.6% (78) | 22.6% (7,052) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.4% (519) | 12.9% (4,025) |
Education Levels Comparison: Richmond vs Sanford
- In Sanford, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.0% in Richmond.
- A higher percentage of residents in Richmond hold a high school diploma at 13.0% compared to 12.5% in Sanford.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Sanford at 22.6%, compared to 2.6% in Richmond.
- A higher percentage of residents in Richmond hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.4% compared to 12.9% in Sanford.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.